atom feed34 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: MX lookup
FromSent OnAttachments
Lukas VeselyJul 29, 2002 8:39 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 29, 2002 2:20 pm 
Lukas VeselyJul 30, 2002 7:59 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 2:30 pm 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 30, 2002 3:02 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 30, 2002 3:20 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 3:21 pm 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 30, 2002 3:32 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 5:35 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 30, 2002 6:03 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 30, 2002 6:13 pm 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 30, 2002 6:20 pm 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 30, 2002 6:37 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 6:47 pm 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 30, 2002 7:20 pm 
Tabor J. WellsJul 30, 2002 7:31 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 7:46 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 30, 2002 8:05 pm 
Bill MichellJul 31, 2002 1:30 am 
Lukas VeselyJul 31, 2002 6:51 am 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 31, 2002 8:43 am 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 31, 2002 8:48 am 
Ben RosengartJul 31, 2002 9:23 am 
Moshe GurvichJul 31, 2002 9:32 am 
Lukas VeselyJul 31, 2002 9:36 am 
Lukas VeselyJul 31, 2002 9:36 am 
Lukas VeselyJul 31, 2002 9:36 am 
Lukas VeselyJul 31, 2002 9:36 am 
Lukas VeselyJul 31, 2002 10:12 am 
Anand BuddhdevJul 31, 2002 10:17 am 
Johannes ErdfeltJul 31, 2002 10:31 am 
Sam VarshavchikJul 31, 2002 2:41 pm 
Lukas VeselyAug 1, 2002 10:16 am 
Luc BrouardAug 6, 2002 12:34 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: MX lookup
From:Johannes Erdfelt (joha@erdfelt.com)
Date:Jul 31, 2002 8:48:42 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Wed, Jul 31, 2002, Lukas Vesely <vese@compik.fd.cvut.cz> wrote:

Cituji z emailu od Bill Michell <bi@mics.org.uk>:

This sounds like it could usefully be used as an option to configure; something like: --with-exhaustive-dns-traversal WARNING: enabling this option could lead to an effective Denial of Service attack on your mail server if a remote

Yes, I agree - or more there could be a parameter that would contain a total number of MX records to try before deferring the message. Because normally the DNS server caches its records it got until the TTL expires - here we've seen it's 1 hour at hotmail so there's no chance the message gets delivered in less than 1hour...

While an option like this might be worthwile pursuing, your assertion that there's no chance the message will get delivered is absolutely wrong.

It's not that their configuration is broken and there is NO CHANCE of connecting and delivering a message to any of the MX's listed.

It's that the MX's are valid but not accepting messages RIGHT NOW and could very well accept messages the next second, next minute, next hour or any time period in between.

JE