

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
4 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] LDAP Tempfails, "...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Adam Bultman | Jun 19, 2007 12:17 pm | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jun 19, 2007 3:37 pm | |
| Adam Bultman | Jun 20, 2007 10:18 am | |
| Sam Varshavchik | Jun 20, 2007 3:19 pm |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: [courier-users] LDAP Tempfails, "Enter username and password" boxes, and courier-authdaemon | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Adam Bultman (abul...@mtasolutions.com) | |
| Date: | Jun 20, 2007 10:18:59 am | |
| List: | net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users | |
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Adam Bultman writes:
For about 6 months, it was only the one "large" server (The ~22k user one) and things ran fine. We have a Foundry SI4G load balancer which we were using to load balance LDAP requests over 3 servers (one linux, two solaris.)
What we found is that Courier-authdaemon will make a heck of a lot of connections to LDAP, and never close them down
No, it doesn't. Each authdaemon will open exactly one LDAP connection, that will remain open as long as authdaemon is running, or until there's 1-2 minutes of inactivity. There may be a temporary second connection, if you use authenticated binds, but there will never be more than two persistent LDAP connections from a single authdaemon processes.
I have also tried changing the number of daemons that the authdaemon fires up, but that doesn't seem to make much of a difference. It has ranged from 500 to 55 (I have it at 55 currently) but no matter what, courier tempfails and irritates the users.
55 connections is required for, maybe, Yahoo or AOL. For you, it's overkill, and the default of five authdaemon processes should be sufficient.
Assuming a very generous 100 milliseconds per LDAP lookup, a single authdaemon process will handle ten lookups per second. Five of them will handle fifty a second, three hundred a minute, and 18,000 per hour.
So, unless all of your 22K users logs on more often than once an hour, five connections will be more than enough.
I'm at the end of my rope, and I can't figure out what to do next. Any help would be appreciated.
More than likely your load balancer is broken, and must be fixed. My guess is that it assumes that LDAP connections are short term connections. And they are, with most simple-minded LDAP clients, that bind, query, and disconnect. Authdaemon is more efficient than that. It opens a connection and holds it open, avoiding the utterly useless waste of time for connecting and disconnecting from the LDAP server, for each authentication time.
Each authdaemon is probably connecting to your LDAP server, through your load balancer, with the first authentication attempt. After the response is received, the load balancer assumes that the connection is no longer needed, and drops it from its memory, but as far as the authdaemon and LDAP server is concerned, it's still a valid connection.
With the next connection attempt, authdaemon gets a broken socket indication, since the load balancer has dropped the first connection from memory, and automatically reconnects to the LDAP server, that still thinks the first connection exists.
It won't take long before everything comes crashing down.
It certainly has come crashing down. The load balancer operated fine for a long time, but only tipped over in the past month or so. However, even going around the load balancer and specifying the servers manually, it overruns the servers with 55 daemons. I *did* put together that more authdaemons = more connections, but there's still a very large number of LDAP connections open from the system if I don't use the load balancer. But that may also be other programs running on the system (authpam, and all that.)
Thanks for the help; I've lowered my daemons to 10 (I don't want to risk breaking things more) from 55, and we'll see where this takes us.
Adam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list cour...@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users







