Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

Vadim, I don't think you got my point. Having an opinion about 673 classes seemed to be a lot of work. And asking the *whole community* for having an opinion about all of them seem to be a rather time consuming way. To me it seem better to have some discussion about how to find an efficient way to choose.

Furthermore we cannot just have any ad hoc selection of classes/interfaces as public API, all classes/interfaces that is refered to from the public API must be part of it. Is there any convenient way to get all refered interfaces from a given set of intefaces?

Concensus about exactly what? To me it was unclear what the exact purpose of the activity was, and I wrote my mail because I wanted to get a better idea about that. And if you are prepared to have helthy lengthy discussions about the specific classes I can't understand why you don't even bother about commenting my opinions about how to classify.

That is BS, I tried to find a practical way of solving the problem of finding a public API with a reasonable amount of effort. I'm not talking about any perfectness here. And for the bundle and separation step aspect, I think I made it pretty clear that it was a separate and later step.

Ity should be rather obvious from my previous post in this thread and from earlier posts that I want us to find out the public API for Cocoon. But to get any further in this discussion I propose that you re-read my last post and give some constructive critic instead of just dissmissing it.

/Daniel