27 messages in com.perforce.jamming[jamming] Jam2.5 and precompiled headers
FromSent OnAttachments
Jacob Gorm Hansen22 Jan 2003 03:18 
Matt Armstrong22 Jan 2003 08:31 
Craig McPheeters22 Jan 2003 11:18 
Jacob Gorm Hansen23 Jan 2003 01:13 
Arnt Gulbrandsen23 Jan 2003 01:32 
Jacob Gorm Hansen23 Jan 2003 01:36 
Jacob Gorm Hansen23 Jan 2003 05:04 
Matt Armstrong23 Jan 2003 10:34 
Chris Antos23 Jan 2003 14:37 
Chris Antos23 Jan 2003 14:56 
Arnt Gulbrandsen24 Jan 2003 02:30 
Matt Armstrong24 Jan 2003 08:58 
Christopher Seiwald24 Jan 2003 16:50 
Matt Armstrong31 Jan 2003 15:04 
Chris Antos31 Jan 2003 15:34 
Elliot Murphy31 Jan 2003 18:58 
Matt Armstrong01 Feb 2003 08:55 
Elliot Murphy01 Feb 2003 09:37 
Chris Antos01 Feb 2003 12:02 
Craig McPheeters03 Feb 2003 10:35 
Jacob Gorm Hansen11 Feb 2003 02:46 
Jacob Gorm Hansen11 Feb 2003 04:56 
Craig McPheeters11 Feb 2003 10:29 
Chris Antos11 Feb 2003 11:13 
Matt Armstrong11 Feb 2003 22:45 
Chris Antos11 Feb 2003 23:27 
Matt Armstrong12 Feb 2003 09:46 
Subject:[jamming] Jam2.5 and precompiled headers
From:Jacob Gorm Hansen (jg@ioi.dk)
Date:02/11/2003 04:56:18 AM
List:com.perforce.jamming

On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 23:37, Chris Antos wrote:

So absolutely Jam should contain rules for using precompiled headers using MSVC. Don't knock it until you've tried it (for a baseline, you should test the pch perf wins outside of Jam as a baseline for what Jam should be able to _beat_; because Jam adds perf wins of its own).

Naturally, I agree. You mentioned in a private post that there is a bug in Jam with regards to the 'on' keyword not correctly restricting its scope. Can you elaborate on this bug and how to fix it?

thanks, Jacob