53 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRe: [Xen-devel] [0/5] [NET]: Add TSO ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 05:02 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 05:04 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 05:07 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 05:07 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 05:08 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 05:09 
Keir Fraser27 Jun 2006 06:26 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 07:02 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 20:57 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 20:58 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 20:59 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 20:59 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 21:00 
Herbert Xu27 Jun 2006 21:00 
Keir Fraser28 Jun 2006 05:29 
Herbert Xu28 Jun 2006 07:02 
Keir Fraser28 Jun 2006 07:24 
Herbert Xu28 Jun 2006 17:19 
Herbert Xu28 Jun 2006 17:21 
Herbert Xu28 Jun 2006 17:21 
Herbert Xu28 Jun 2006 21:44 
Keir Fraser29 Jun 2006 02:01 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 02:40 
Keir Fraser29 Jun 2006 03:32 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 05:45 
Keir Fraser29 Jun 2006 06:19 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 06:25 
Keir Fraser29 Jun 2006 06:41 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 16:08 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 19:40 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 19:41 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 19:42 
Herbert Xu29 Jun 2006 19:42 
Herbert Xu30 Jun 2006 05:46 
Herbert Xu30 Jun 2006 05:47 
Herbert Xu30 Jun 2006 05:47 
Herbert Xu30 Jun 2006 05:48 
Keir Fraser30 Jun 2006 06:06 
Herbert Xu30 Jun 2006 06:21 
Keir Fraser30 Jun 2006 07:36 
Herbert Xu30 Jun 2006 20:25 
Herbert Xu30 Jun 2006 20:32 
Keir Fraser01 Jul 2006 01:16 
Keir Fraser01 Jul 2006 01:23 
Herbert Xu01 Jul 2006 02:59 
Keir Fraser01 Jul 2006 05:17 
Herbert Xu01 Jul 2006 05:38 
Herbert Xu02 Jul 2006 21:44 
Herbert Xu02 Jul 2006 21:45 
Herbert Xu02 Jul 2006 21:45 
Herbert Xu02 Jul 2006 21:46 
Keir Fraser03 Jul 2006 01:12 
Herbert Xu03 Jul 2006 01:13 
Subject:Re: [Xen-devel] [0/5] [NET]: Add TSO support
From:Keir Fraser (Keir@cl.cam.ac.uk)
Date:06/29/2006 06:41:27 AM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

On 29 Jun 2006, at 14:26, Herbert Xu wrote:

If you can recalculate it, why is the field required at all (both in the skbuff and in the netif_tx_extra)? You previously said it was needed because it can't be recalculated (until you get to the segmentation code, which may be very late in packet processing).

It can't be recalculated in general (i.e., in netback). However, within each protocol module it can be recalculated.

In that case we don't need gso_segs in the netif_tx_extra? That, plus limit gso_type, would make me much happier.

-- Keir