

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
38 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] VLSM| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Shaun | Jan 10, 2005 4:53 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 10, 2005 5:26 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 10, 2005 5:27 pm | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 10, 2005 5:46 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 10, 2005 6:19 pm | |
| Michael Smith | Jan 10, 2005 6:26 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 10, 2005 6:28 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 10, 2005 6:55 pm | |
| Brant I. Stevens | Jan 10, 2005 11:25 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:33 am | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 6:11 am | |
| Mark Persiko | Jan 11, 2005 10:49 am | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 11:22 am | |
| Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN | Jan 11, 2005 12:11 pm | |
| Brant I. Stevens | Jan 11, 2005 12:45 pm | |
| Pete Templin | Jan 11, 2005 12:52 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 1:30 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 1:39 pm | |
| Pete Templin | Jan 11, 2005 2:09 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:47 pm | |
| Gert Doering | Jan 11, 2005 2:48 pm | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 11, 2005 3:09 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 11, 2005 5:22 pm | |
| Anson Rinesmith | Jan 11, 2005 5:47 pm | |
| Michael Loftis | Jan 11, 2005 5:57 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 7:23 pm | |
| Stephen J. Wilcox | Jan 11, 2005 7:37 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 11, 2005 8:31 pm | |
| Jon Lewis | Jan 11, 2005 9:48 pm | |
| Majid Farid | Jan 12, 2005 12:24 am | |
| matthew zeier | Jan 12, 2005 1:23 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:41 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:44 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 12, 2005 1:51 am | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 12, 2005 1:18 pm | |
| lis...@hojmark.org | Jan 12, 2005 1:30 pm | |
| Shaun | Jan 13, 2005 4:05 am | |
| Ted Mittelstaedt | Jan 14, 2005 12:29 am |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | [c-nsp] VLSM | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Stephen J. Wilcox (ste...@telecomplete.co.uk) | |
| Date: | Jan 11, 2005 6:11:26 am | |
| List: | net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp | |
bgp/eigrp: hence my pick on cisco in my original email altho these are now default no auto-summary afaik
ripv1 is the (rare) exception not the rule tho
Steve
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Brant I. Stevens wrote:
While I agree that having no class (when talking about networking :B) is a good thing, "classfulness" is not completely dead... Sometimes you still have to use RIP v1.. There's also EIGRP and BGP auto-summary using classful boundaries.
On 01/10/2005 06:59 PM, "lis...@hojmark.org" <lis...@hojmark.org> wrote:
However, I can't get people (sales) to stop calling it "class c".
Even worse is when they (and some 'techs') call everything /24 a "class C" and a every /16 a "class B", even when it's 10.10.10/24 and 10.10/16, for example.
Yuck.
-A
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisc...@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/







