atom feed28 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.security-servicesRE: [security-services] Use Cases
FromSent OnAttachments
Beach, Michael COct 23, 2003 12:49 pm.bin, .doc
John KempNov 24, 2003 1:58 pm 
Beach, Michael CNov 25, 2003 11:24 am 
Greg WhiteheadNov 25, 2003 11:50 am 
Beach, Michael CNov 25, 2003 12:24 pm 
Greg WhiteheadNov 25, 2003 12:32 pm 
John KempNov 26, 2003 6:20 am 
Scott CantorNov 26, 2003 8:22 am 
John KempNov 27, 2003 7:49 am 
Scott CantorNov 28, 2003 9:30 pm 
Conor P. CahillNov 29, 2003 2:14 am 
Conor P. CahillNov 29, 2003 2:25 am 
Conor P. CahillNov 29, 2003 2:27 am 
John KempNov 29, 2003 5:54 am 
Conor P. CahillNov 29, 2003 11:35 am 
Beach, Michael CNov 29, 2003 11:37 am 
John KempNov 29, 2003 11:52 am 
Beach, Michael CNov 29, 2003 11:59 am 
Beach, Michael CNov 29, 2003 12:03 pm 
Conor P. CahillNov 29, 2003 1:46 pm 
Conor P. CahillNov 29, 2003 2:59 pm 
Anthony NadalinNov 30, 2003 5:23 pm 
Conor P. CahillNov 30, 2003 7:18 pm 
Conor P. CahillDec 1, 2003 4:16 am 
Anthony NadalinDec 1, 2003 9:31 pm 
Conor P. CahillDec 2, 2003 4:38 am 
Anthony NadalinDec 3, 2003 4:36 am 
Conor P. CahillDec 3, 2003 4:54 am 
Subject:RE: [security-services] Use Cases
From:Conor P. Cahill (conc@aol.com)
Date:Nov 29, 2003 2:27:48 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.security-services

Beach, Michael C wrote on 11/25/2003, 3:26 PM:

Agree with your comments, I think. A clarification - the ForceAuthn would only apply for the session for which the SP makes the ForceAuthn request, not all sessions.

Right?

ForceAuthn only applies to the particular AuthnRequest that is sent to the IdP. It has no direct impact on other IdP interactions (although it will likely have the indirect effect of altering the assertion returned for subsequent AuthnRequests to that IdP within that IdPs user session since the AuthenticationInstant and perhaps context will have changed).

Conor