On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Juha Saarinen wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
I don't think it's that silly.
Multiple NS records, by design, are load balanced. Multiple A records
are load balanced.
Why shouldn't multiple MX records be load balanced? What makes them so
special to be treated differently?
Here's a better explanation than mine (forgot about cacheing):