atom feed31 messages in edu.merit.nanogRe: US DOJ victim letter
FromSent OnAttachments
Jay HenniganJan 19, 2012 12:59 pm 
Michael HareJan 19, 2012 1:01 pm 
Tim JacksonJan 19, 2012 1:02 pm 
Dave EllisJan 19, 2012 1:03 pm 
Michael J McCaffertyJan 19, 2012 1:04 pm 
MLJan 19, 2012 1:05 pm 
Randy CarpenterJan 19, 2012 1:05 pm 
Alan CleggJan 19, 2012 1:08 pm 
Chris AdamsJan 19, 2012 1:16 pm 
Chris AdamsJan 19, 2012 1:18 pm 
PCJan 19, 2012 1:33 pm 
Todd LyonsJan 19, 2012 1:37 pm 
-Hammer-Jan 20, 2012 6:06 am 
Mike AndrewsJan 20, 2012 6:55 am 
Carlos AlcantarJan 27, 2012 10:11 am 
Randy EpsteinJan 27, 2012 10:20 am 
MikeJan 27, 2012 10:21 am 
Vald...@vt.eduJan 27, 2012 10:22 am 
Randy EpsteinJan 27, 2012 10:31 am 
Carlos AlcantarJan 27, 2012 10:45 am 
Sean DonelanJan 27, 2012 10:52 am 
Jon LewisJan 27, 2012 12:22 pm 
Harry HoffmanJan 27, 2012 12:29 pm 
Martin HanniganJan 27, 2012 7:19 pm 
bman...@vacation.karoshi.comJan 28, 2012 8:30 am 
Ryan GelobterJan 28, 2012 7:11 pm 
Jack BatesJan 30, 2012 7:53 am 
Ronald BonicaJan 31, 2012 5:29 pm 
TFMLFeb 1, 2012 7:32 am 
PCFeb 1, 2012 11:53 am 
bman...@vacation.karoshi.comFeb 2, 2012 3:22 am 
Subject:Re: US DOJ victim letter
From:Alan Clegg (al@clegg.com)
Date:Jan 19, 2012 1:08:00 pm
List:edu.merit.nanog

On 1/19/2012 4:04 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:

The body of the email indeed reads like a poorly-executed phish including elements such as "null" and "<personalized code here>" but headers seem legit.

I asked a local contact if it was legit and he confirmed that it is.

Wait for the paper mail.

I was amused to discover that to proceed on the web, I had to enter my last name as "Representative" -- as in "Dear Business Representative". Yep, really.

AlanC