Messages per Month
62 messages in org.codehaus.groovy.devRe: [groovy-dev] Groovy performance: ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Alex Tkachman | 19 Feb 2008 02:09 | |
| Steven Devijver | 19 Feb 2008 02:37 | |
| Alexandru Popescu ☀ | 19 Feb 2008 02:57 | |
| Alex Tkachman | 19 Feb 2008 03:03 | |
| Patric Bechtel | 19 Feb 2008 03:12 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 19 Feb 2008 03:25 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 19 Feb 2008 03:26 | |
| Patric Bechtel | 19 Feb 2008 05:05 | |
| Gavin Grover | 19 Feb 2008 05:51 | |
| Steven Devijver | 19 Feb 2008 05:52 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 19 Feb 2008 05:54 | |
| Tom Nichols | 19 Feb 2008 06:26 | |
| Alex Tkachman | 19 Feb 2008 06:28 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 19 Feb 2008 06:35 | |
| Tom Nichols | 19 Feb 2008 07:03 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 19 Feb 2008 07:38 | |
| Chanwit Kaewkasi | 19 Feb 2008 07:52 | |
| Charles Oliver Nutter | 19 Feb 2008 08:49 | |
| Steven Devijver | 19 Feb 2008 10:03 | |
| Charles Oliver Nutter | 19 Feb 2008 11:38 | |
| Steven Devijver | 19 Feb 2008 12:11 | |
| Alex Tkachman | 19 Feb 2008 12:39 | |
| Alex Tkachman | 19 Feb 2008 12:48 | |
| tugwilson | 19 Feb 2008 13:36 | |
| Alex Tkachman | 19 Feb 2008 20:51 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 20 Feb 2008 02:10 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 20 Feb 2008 09:46 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 20 Feb 2008 17:25 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 21 Feb 2008 01:35 | |
| Tom Nichols | 21 Feb 2008 04:15 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 21 Feb 2008 05:44 | |
| Tom Nichols | 21 Feb 2008 06:22 | |
| Smith, Jason, CTR, OASD(HA)/TMA | 21 Feb 2008 06:34 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 21 Feb 2008 06:43 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 21 Feb 2008 06:48 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 21 Feb 2008 07:04 | |
| Smith, Jason, CTR, OASD(HA)/TMA | 21 Feb 2008 07:18 | |
| Charles Oliver Nutter | 21 Feb 2008 07:38 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 21 Feb 2008 07:42 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 21 Feb 2008 08:36 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 21 Feb 2008 08:48 | |
| Pascal DeMilly | 21 Feb 2008 17:35 | |
| Gavin Grover | 21 Feb 2008 18:21 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 22 Feb 2008 04:31 | |
| Tom Nichols | 22 Feb 2008 04:49 | |
| Charles Oliver Nutter | 22 Feb 2008 23:43 | |
| Guillaume Laforge | 23 Feb 2008 00:28 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 23 Feb 2008 03:51 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 23 Feb 2008 14:49 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 23 Feb 2008 14:53 | |
| Charles Oliver Nutter | 24 Feb 2008 02:01 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 24 Feb 2008 03:56 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 24 Feb 2008 04:11 | |
| Charles Oliver Nutter | 24 Feb 2008 05:12 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 24 Feb 2008 15:17 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 24 Feb 2008 15:31 | |
| Alexandru Popescu ☀ | 24 Feb 2008 15:36 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 26 Feb 2008 14:20 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 26 Feb 2008 15:15 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 27 Feb 2008 02:38 | |
| Jochen Theodorou | 27 Feb 2008 03:03 | |
| Martin C. Martin | 02 Mar 2008 17:21 |
| Subject: | Re: [groovy-dev] Groovy performance: what to do![]() |
|---|---|
| From: | Charles Oliver Nutter (char...@sun.com) |
| Date: | 02/21/2008 07:38:27 AM |
| List: | org.codehaus.groovy.dev |
Tom Nichols wrote:
I think the "pro static annotation" people are basing their argument on the assumption that "pure" dynamic Groovy will never be able to attain the same performance of a non-dynamic-annotated variant. If re-architecting Groovy's MOP will allow it to attain ~half of Java's speed, then fine, that's great, go there.
I believe that, excluding raw numeric performance for which primitives are necessary, Groovy and other JVM dynlangs can approach Java speed with appropriate designs. We just need a bit more work to get there.
- Charlie
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:




