atom feed28 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: additional queue macro
FromSent OnAttachments
Jonathan LemonJul 2, 2002 7:53 am 
W Gerald HicksJul 2, 2002 8:08 am 
Ian DowseJul 2, 2002 8:12 am 
Garrett WollmanJul 2, 2002 9:53 am 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 12:58 pm 
Jonathan LemonJul 2, 2002 1:34 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 1:47 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 3:43 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:07 pm 
Garrett WollmanJul 2, 2002 4:26 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:35 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:54 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 5:02 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 5:05 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 5:50 pm 
Bruce EvansJul 2, 2002 11:57 pm 
Terry LambertJul 3, 2002 10:37 am 
Garance A DrosihnJul 3, 2002 10:46 am 
Neal FachanJul 3, 2002 1:46 pm.diff
Julian ElischerJul 3, 2002 4:04 pm 
Neal FachanJul 3, 2002 5:12 pm 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 6:27 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 8:36 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 10:07 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 10:33 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 11:29 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 11:40 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 12:23 pm 
Subject:Re: additional queue macro
From:Garance A Drosihn (dro@rpi.edu)
Date:Jul 3, 2002 10:46:56 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

At 10:38 AM -0700 7/3/02, Terry Lambert wrote:

TAILQ_FOREACH_REMOVABLE or TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE (I prefer the first) are my suggestions for the name.)

TAILQ_FOREACH_MODIFY ?

I sense great material for a bikeshed... :-)

For mine, how about: TAILQ_FOREACH_VOLATILE

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message