| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 19, 2009 8:44 am | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jan 19, 2009 9:16 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Jan 19, 2009 10:05 am | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 19, 2009 10:10 am | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jan 19, 2009 10:31 am | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 19, 2009 10:44 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Jan 19, 2009 10:57 am | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jan 19, 2009 11:09 am | |
| David Faure | Jan 19, 2009 11:10 am | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jan 19, 2009 12:52 pm | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 19, 2009 1:29 pm | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 19, 2009 1:29 pm | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 19, 2009 3:18 pm | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 19, 2009 3:46 pm | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jan 19, 2009 11:44 pm | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jan 19, 2009 11:54 pm | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jan 20, 2009 1:31 am | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jan 20, 2009 5:05 am | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jan 20, 2009 5:32 am | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jan 20, 2009 5:58 am | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 20, 2009 8:42 am | |
| David Faure | Jan 20, 2009 10:02 am | |
| Duane Nickull | Jan 20, 2009 10:30 am | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jan 20, 2009 10:51 am | |
| David Faure | Jan 20, 2009 11:59 am | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jan 20, 2009 12:41 pm | |
| David Faure | Jan 20, 2009 5:04 pm | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 20, 2009 9:39 pm | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jan 21, 2009 12:09 am | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jan 21, 2009 12:56 am | |
| Duane Nickull | Jan 21, 2009 9:26 am | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Jan 21, 2009 11:04 am | |
| Duane Nickull | Jan 21, 2009 11:31 am | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Feb 3, 2009 3:23 pm | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Feb 3, 2009 4:48 pm | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Feb 3, 2009 8:45 pm | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Feb 4, 2009 11:24 am | |
| Dennis E. Hamilton | Feb 4, 2009 12:06 pm |
| Subject: | RE: [office] ODF 1.2 Single-Level Conformance and Law of Unintended Consequences | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | robe...@us.ibm.com (robe...@us.ibm.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 19, 2009 11:09:39 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.office | |
"Dennis E. Hamilton" <denn...@acm.org> wrote on 01/19/2009 01:10:56 PM:
Thanks Rob,
With regard to current allowances of implementation-defined features, the choice of schema matters. The "strict" schema actually removes some areas where implementation-defined extensions were explicit in the schema itself. (And, for a different example, I assert that it is a feature, not a limitation, to have omission of table:protection-key-digest-algorithm mean that the hash function that produces the table:protection-key is implementation defined [and also upward-compatible from 1.1 as well].)
Agreed. We need to know what the schema would look like from this change. Are we removing all foreign attributes and elements, or keeping the specifically enumerated ones but eliminating the boundless case? I don't think Michael's written proposal addressed that question specifically.
-Rob
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php





