19 messages in com.perforce.perforce-userPerforce wish list| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| TomB...@ebc.ericsson.se | 19 Jan 1999 23:43 | |
| BobA...@weblogic.com | 19 Jan 1999 23:57 | |
| Paul...@zergo.com | 20 Jan 1999 01:10 | |
| Sand...@hmmh.com | 20 Jan 1999 06:13 | |
| Paul...@zergo.com | 20 Jan 1999 06:32 | |
| chri...@natinst.comchris.bartz | 20 Jan 1999 08:12 | |
| Brad...@enteract.com | 20 Jan 1999 08:19 | |
| Andr...@placeware.com | 20 Jan 1999 08:52 | |
| Scot...@seanet.com | 20 Jan 1999 10:36 | |
| Stev...@qualcomm.com | 20 Jan 1999 10:57 | |
| Scot...@seanet.com | 20 Jan 1999 11:18 | |
| Davi...@home.chat.net | 20 Jan 1999 11:35 | |
| Andr...@placeware.com | 20 Jan 1999 11:44 | |
| Robe...@scrap.de | 21 Jan 1999 00:41 | |
| Scot...@seanet.com | 21 Jan 1999 09:45 | |
| Timo...@ftlsol.com | 21 Jan 1999 13:12 | |
| Robe...@scrap.de | 21 Jan 1999 22:49 | |
| Scot...@seanet.com | 22 Jan 1999 11:56 | |
| Robe...@scrap.de | 24 Jan 1999 08:06 |
| Subject: | Perforce wish list |
|---|---|
| From: | Paul...@zergo.com (Paul...@zergo.com) |
| Date: | 01/20/1999 01:10:23 AM |
| List: | com.perforce.perforce-user |
I actually think that the protections scheme needs a bigger rework.
The biggest problem for me is that I can't give project leaders "Full control" of their own projects without making them superusers for the entire server.
So, for me, UNIX or NT style access lists are the model I'd like to see adopted.
------Original Message----- From: bo...@weblogic.com [mailto:boba at weblogic.com] Sent: 20 January 1999 07:58 To: Perforce mailing list; support at perforce.com Cc: Tom.Bjorkholm at ebc.ericsson.se Subject: Re: Perforce wish list
At 08:43 AM 1/20/99 +0100, Tom Björkholm wrote:
2) p4 ipgroup We like the "p4 group" and "p4 groups" command. It has made administration of users much easier. But we would like to have the equivalent for for IP addresses.
I second that request. As our network has grown, so have the number of subnet IP addresses, causing our protections list (which had gone on a successful diet thanks to p4 groups) to bloat again. We're also seeing groups of subnets that require different protections, so p4 ipgroup functionality would be just the ticket.
BobA
___________________________________________________________________________ Bob Andrews BEA WebXpress (formerly WebLogic) Software Infrastructure Engineer 550 California Street, Suite 900 (415) 659-2627 San Francisco, CA 94104-1006 mailto:boba at weblogic.com http://www.weblogic.com/