Hi Peter,

I agree this (ATK/ATSPI mapping of disjoint headings) is an edge case in the
field. However, I believe what spurred this on was the paper Jutta wrote about OOXML.. Honestly, much of this
could be addressed by using a labelleby relations explicitly set in the markup like we did with caption-id.

I am burried as well, I am trying ot get ARIA to last call and that is no small
undertaking. I will be traveling to Toronto next week too. So, I understand.

What were your thoughts on the 1.2 accessibility guidelines format?

Rich

Rich Schwerdtfeger Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer [1]Inactive hide details for Peter Korn <Pete...@Sun.COM>Peter Korn
<Pete...@Sun.COM>

Peter Korn <Pete...@Sun.COM> To Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Sent by: Pete...@Sun.COM cc
offi...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject Re: [office-accessibility] Agenda:
September 6 ODF Accessibility SC Meeting

Hi Rich, It is a real edge case. I'm not certain how real an issue this is in the field.
Also, in talking with Willie Walker about this, there are some potential strategies for exposing this
information within our existing APIs.

So, fundamentally, I'm not sure...

A couple other questions:

What is your position keeping the same format of the accessibility guidelines
we have today vs. following the W3C ATAG structure? http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ATAG20-20061207/

Also, have the accessibility guidelines been made available publicly on the
OASIS site? If not, shouldn't we have OASIS make a public announcement about them? It is my fault it isn't published by OASIS. While we ratified the document
(the "final draft"), I need to change the footer, and change some of the stuff on the front page, to make
this a true "final" document and get it published.

I have been utterly buried in burning fires that I'm way behind delivering.
I'll get to it just as soon as I have two spare moments...

Peter Korn Accessibility Architect, Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Rich

Rich Schwerdtfeger Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer [2]Inactive hide details for Peter Korn <Pete...@Sun.COM>Peter Korn
<Pete...@Sun.COM>

Peter Korn <Pete...@Sun.COM> To Richard
Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Sent by: Pete...@Sun.COM cc
offi...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject Re: [office-accessibility]
Agenda: September 6 ODF Accessibility SC Meeting

Hi Rich, gang,

I will have to miss this call (I'm in DC, hip-deep in Section 508 rewrite
fun).

I see one action item assigned explicitly to me, and I completed it a while
ago. AT-SPI does NOT have a way of conveying multiple, dis-joint header cells.

Regards,

Peter Korn Accessibility Architect, Sun Microsystems, Inc.

Please note your open action items. We will discuss these on the call.

Thursday 6Sep; 8am PT / 10am CST/ 11am ET / 4pm GMT / 5pm CET

US: 1-877-421-0030 Toll: 770-615-1247

Toll Free Toll

UK: 0808-234-1969 +44 2070260533

IBM Tie-Line: 421-0030 IBM ITN: 2-421-0030 2-421-0035 from Europe

The passcode is a11yorg aka 2119674.

IRC: http://irc.oasis-open.org channel: "&office-accessibility"

I would like to propose for our agenda:

Agenda: September 6 ODF Accessibility SC Meeting

1. Assign scribe and role call 2. Approve August 23 Minutes: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office-accessibility/email/archives/200708/msg00023.html 3. Review Open Action Items 4. Discuss Format for Accessibility Guidelines 1.2

Latest ODF 1.2 Draft: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/office/download.php/25035/OpenDocument-v1.2-draft5.odt

Open Action Items

1. Everyone to put forward accessibility points in ODF v1.1 that are "worth documenting" -> Look to WCAG 2.0, TEITAC Content a11y guidelines draft, our own comparison document, DAISY transformation, Braille generation, our own experience - to build the list 2. Dave Pawson: look at HTML example on slide #3 of Hiro, to see how we can encode the "San Jose" stuff in ODF (see Hiro's e-mail http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/email/office-accessibility/200708/msg00005.html) 3. Chieko to review glossary changes in subcommittee draft #2, reply with any concerns/edits/changes 4. Peter Korn & Pete Brunet - verify how ATK & IAccessible2 can convey multiple dis-joint row & column headers (Hiro's slides #8 & #13 from his e-mail http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/group_public/email/office-accessibility/200708/msg00005.html) which ODF can encode so long as the headers are in their own groups

5. (From August 23 meeting) - Group Actions

o Modify next version of accessibility guidelines to ensure
applications respond to system font and color settings. o Add wording to the next revison of the accessibilty guidelines to
allow control of the animation rate of images in a presentation o Modify accessibility guidelines to state how common field
attributes (section 6.7 of the ODF 1.2 spec.) should be supplied to the AT. The field attributes would

References

Visible links