31 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] autonegotiating hub was: Defe...
FromSent OnAttachments
Clinton WorkJan 14, 2005 5:25 pm 
jex...@harding.eduJan 14, 2005 5:36 pm 
Larry SmithJan 14, 2005 5:45 pm 
John NeibergerJan 14, 2005 5:53 pm 
Michael K. SmithJan 14, 2005 5:55 pm 
Niels BakkerJan 14, 2005 7:35 pm 
Anthony D CennamiJan 14, 2005 8:19 pm 
Greg SchwimerJan 14, 2005 9:16 pm 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 3:03 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 15, 2005 3:55 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 4:05 am 
Chris CappuccioJan 15, 2005 4:11 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 4:16 am 
lee....@census.govJan 15, 2005 7:23 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 15, 2005 8:14 am 
MikeJan 15, 2005 9:25 am 
Church, ChuckJan 15, 2005 9:47 am 
Gert DoeringJan 15, 2005 11:20 am 
Ted MittelstaedtJan 15, 2005 11:31 am 
Gert DoeringJan 15, 2005 11:57 am 
Michael K. SmithJan 15, 2005 4:25 pm 
Gert DoeringJan 15, 2005 4:45 pm 
Michael K. SmithJan 15, 2005 4:48 pm 
Michael K. SmithJan 15, 2005 4:52 pm 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 16, 2005 2:33 am 
Majid FaridJan 16, 2005 2:42 am 
Reuben FarrellyJan 16, 2005 5:35 am 
Mikael AbrahamssonJan 16, 2005 5:49 am 
Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBNJan 18, 2005 10:26 am 
Vincent De KeyzerJan 18, 2005 10:40 am 
Clinton WorkJan 19, 2005 11:48 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] autonegotiating hub was: Deferred packets on 295010/full interfaceActions...
From:Gert Doering (ge@greenie.muc.de)
Date:Jan 15, 2005 11:57:22 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Hi,

On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 08:31:19AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:

It is a testiment to this already happening that most people here knew what I meant, even with the incorrect term used. It won't be much longer before the incorrect term will become the correct term. I hope you can survive this. ;-)

There's a difference between "everyday things" and technical professionals talking to each others about a specific problem area - where using the wrong term is just *wrong*.

Of course these people out there call everything a "DSL modem" nowadays, but does that mean we should be sloppy in a very targeted discussion about ethernet things? I say "no".

gert

-- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany ge@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025 ge@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de