atom feed24 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: AIO support on Linux
FromSent OnAttachments
GentooOct 17, 2006 5:30 pm 
Igor SysoevOct 17, 2006 11:51 pm 
GentooOct 18, 2006 1:25 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 18, 2006 3:09 am 
GentooOct 19, 2006 3:19 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 19, 2006 3:37 am 
Igor SysoevOct 19, 2006 4:42 am 
GentooOct 19, 2006 4:54 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 19, 2006 5:00 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 19, 2006 5:03 am 
Igor SysoevOct 19, 2006 5:27 am 
GentooOct 19, 2006 8:22 am 
Igor SysoevOct 19, 2006 9:00 am 
Delta YehOct 19, 2006 6:52 pm 
Aleksandar LazicOct 20, 2006 12:04 am 
GentooOct 20, 2006 12:11 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 20, 2006 12:54 am 
Igor SysoevOct 20, 2006 12:57 am 
Igor SysoevOct 20, 2006 1:01 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 20, 2006 1:15 am 
Delta YehOct 20, 2006 3:00 am 
Jonathan DanceOct 30, 2006 7:41 am 
Aleksandar LazicOct 30, 2006 9:28 am 
ThomasMay 10, 2008 12:05 pm 
Subject:Re: AIO support on Linux
From:Gentoo (debi@public.gmane.org)
Date:Oct 19, 2006 8:22:12 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

I bet multi workers can not work as well as aio.

On 10/19/06, Igor Sysoev <is-G@public.gmane.org> wrote:

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:

On Don 19.10.2006 15:42, Igor Sysoev wrote:

Sorry, it's difficult to me to write in English, so I will be short: I do not think that AIO support in nginx will add huge perfomance boost because:

1) You can run 100 worker processes to issue 100 simultaneous disk IO operations. You can not do it with lighttpd and other single process servers.

I'am not a fan of lighty but to be fair, since 1.4.x lighty have something similar like 'worker_processes' as far as I know:

http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/server.max-workerDetails http://trac.lighttpd.net/trac/wiki/Docs%3AMultiProcessor

I don't know how scalable or robust it is.

Thank you, I missed this.