Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees - Boris Derzhavets - com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

38 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRe: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Lin...

From	Sent On	Attachments
Keir Fraser	Jun 4, 2009 8:45 am
Jean Guyader	Jun 4, 2009 9:09 am
Tim Post	Jun 4, 2009 9:15 am
Boris Derzhavets	Jun 4, 2009 11:01 am
Espen Skoglund	Jun 4, 2009 11:07 am
Keir Fraser	Jun 4, 2009 11:17 am
Jean Guyader	Jun 4, 2009 11:20 am
Jean Guyader	Jun 4, 2009 11:46 am
Keir Fraser	Jun 4, 2009 12:08 pm
Jean Guyader	Jun 4, 2009 12:12 pm
Andrew Lyon	Jun 5, 2009 12:31 am
Boris Derzhavets	Jun 5, 2009 12:36 am
Pasi Kärkkäinen	Jun 5, 2009 12:46 am
Keir Fraser	Jun 5, 2009 12:51 am
Boris Derzhavets	Jun 5, 2009 12:53 am
Jean Guyader	Jun 5, 2009 12:57 am
Pasi Kärkkäinen	Jun 5, 2009 1:29 am
Boris Derzhavets	Jun 5, 2009 3:44 am
Christian Tramnitz	Jun 5, 2009 6:26 am
Keir Fraser	Jun 5, 2009 6:36 am
Dulloor	Jun 5, 2009 7:04 am
Christian Tramnitz	Jun 5, 2009 7:05 am
Ian Pratt	Jun 5, 2009 7:36 am
Gerd Hoffmann	Jun 5, 2009 9:40 am
Gerd Hoffmann	Jun 5, 2009 10:12 am
Carsten Schiers	Jun 5, 2009 10:58 am
Keir Fraser	Jun 5, 2009 11:48 am
Andy Burns	Jun 5, 2009 11:51 am
Carsten Schiers	Jun 5, 2009 2:02 pm
Genki Kuroda	Jun 5, 2009 4:05 pm
Kamala Narasimhan	Jun 5, 2009 7:16 pm
Genki Kuroda	Jun 5, 2009 7:47 pm
Kamala Narasimhan	Jun 5, 2009 7:53 pm
Genki Kuroda	Jun 5, 2009 10:25 pm
Jean Guyader	Jun 6, 2009 2:54 am
Boris Derzhavets	Jun 6, 2009 1:11 pm
Pasi Kärkkäinen	Jun 7, 2009 10:09 am
Andy Burns	Jun 7, 2009 11:51 am

Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees
From:	Boris Derzhavets (bder...@yahoo.com)
Date:	Jun 6, 2009 1:11:20 pm
List:	com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

Works fine.

root@SeverUbuntuJaunty:~# xm info host                   : SeverUbuntuJaunty release                : 2.6.27.19-5.1 version                : #1 SMP Sat Jun 6 23:35:05 MSD 2009 machine                : x86_64 nr_cpus                : 4 nr_nodes               : 1 cores_per_socket       : 4 threads_per_core       : 1 cpu_mhz                : 2833 hw_caps                :
bfebfbff:20100800:00000000:00000140:0408e3fd:00000000:00000001:00000000 virt_caps              : hvm total_memory           : 8191 free_memory            : 7 node_to_cpu            : node0:0-3 node_to_memory         : node0:7 xen_major              : 3 xen_minor              : 4 xen_extra              : .1-rc1-pre xen_caps               : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32
hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64 xen_scheduler          : credit xen_pagesize           : 4096 platform_params        : virt_start=0xffff800000000000 xen_changeset          : Mon Jun 01 14:56:17 2009 +0100 19628:29d7e3522cc5 cc_compiler            : gcc version 4.3.2 (Ubuntu 4.3.2-1ubuntu12) cc_compile_by          : root cc_compile_domain      : cc_compile_date        : Thu Jun 4 07:24:19 EDT 2009 xend_config_format     : 4

Boris.

--- On Sat, 6/6/09, Jean Guyader <jean...@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Jean Guyader <jean...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees To: "Genki Kuroda" <sfsu...@gmail.com> Cc: "xen-...@lists.xensource.com" <xen-...@lists.xensource.com>, "Kamala
Narasimhan" <Kama...@citrix.com> Date: Saturday, June 6, 2009, 5:54 AM

You can disable all the wmi-XCI patch by openning the series file (.git/patches/master/serie) and comment out the entry for this patch at the end of the file. Then you do a guilt-pop -a && guilt-push -a.

2009/6/6 Genki Kuroda <sfsu...@gmail.com>:

Hi Kamala,

I encountered the wmi build issues after applying the linux-2.6.27-pq.git I have no idea on what happens before applying the linux-2.6.27-pq.git

All I did was:

$ git clone http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/xenclient/linux-2.6.27.git $ cd linux-2.6.27 $ git clone http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/xenclient/linux-2.6.27-pq.git .git/patches $ guilt-push -a $ make --> wmi build issues.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Kamala Narasimhan<Kama...@citrix.com> wrote:

Just to clarify - You mean you encounter wmi build issues mentioned below with
XenClient Linux 2.6.27 even when you *don't* apply the xen-acpi-wmi patch from
XenClient Linux 2.6.27 patch queue?

Kamala

-----Original Message----- From: Genki Kuroda [mailto:sfsu...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:48 PM To: Kamala Narasimhan Cc: xen-...@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees

Hi, Kamala,

Thank you for the information. I didn't apply the patch, and I don't have any intention to apply the patch for this issue.

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Kamala Narasimhan<Kama...@citrix.com> wrote:

The xen-acpi-wmi patch in XenClient linux 2.6.27 patch queue is tied

to XenClient. I didn't expect this patch to be used outside the scope of XenClient which is why you encounter the below issues.

Could you please momentarily exclude the patch before pushing the

rest or revert it if already applied and then build that branch? Going forward, I will create a XenClient flavor of wmi.c that won't step on the base wmi implementation and configure the two to be mutually exclusive.

Kamala

-----Original Message----- From: xen-...@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel- boun...@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Genki Kuroda Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 7:06 PM To: Boris Derzhavets Cc: xen-...@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees

Hello, Boris,

I had the same error, but I was able to compile after commenting out the "HACK ALERT" section in /drivers/acpi/ec.c More information seems to be in wmi.c.

Who is taking care of this kind of issue? This is my first post...

Here is the patch to show where I commented out.

diff –git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c index 2359480..b2c0221 100644 — a/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_read(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 address, u8 * data) /* HACK ALERT * Please refer to wmi.c for an explanation on why we added this hack. */ +/* if ( in_query_wmi_event_data == TRUE ) { if ( address == 0×2b ) { wmi_event_data_index = 0; @@ -398,6 +399,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_read(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 address, u8 * data) wmi_event_data_index++; } } +*/

return result; }

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Boris Derzhavets<bder...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Kernel: arch/x86/boot/vmlinuz is ready (#2) ERROR: "wmi_install_notify_handler" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko] undefined! ERROR: "wmi_remove_notify_handler" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko] undefined! ERROR: "wmi_has_guid" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko] undefined! ERROR: "wmi_has_guid" [drivers/misc/acer-wmi.ko] undefined! WARNING: modpost: Found 3 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1 make: *** [modules] Error 2

Boris.

	Start a set with this search
	Include this search in one of my sets
	Exclude this search from one of my sets