11 messages in net.java.dev.socialsite.devRe: Flexible relationship states| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dave | Nov 6, 2008 9:04 am | |
| Jamey Wood | Nov 6, 2008 9:39 am | |
| Dave | Nov 6, 2008 11:16 am | |
| Jamey Wood | Nov 6, 2008 11:53 am | |
| Dave | Nov 6, 2008 12:33 pm | |
| Dave | Nov 6, 2008 1:04 pm | |
| Jamey Wood | Nov 6, 2008 2:11 pm | |
| Dave | Nov 7, 2008 4:52 am | |
| Jamey Wood | Nov 7, 2008 9:01 am | |
| Vijay Ramachandran | Nov 7, 2008 10:17 am | |
| Dave | Nov 17, 2008 8:34 am |
| Subject: | Re: Flexible relationship states | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Dave (snoo...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Nov 6, 2008 11:16:42 am | |
| List: | net.java.dev.socialsite.dev | |
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Jamey Wood <Jame...@sun.com> wrote:
http://wikis.glassfish.org/socialsite/Wiki.jsp?page=FlexibleRelationships Feedback is welcome.
Just a couple of things...
First, the "Receiving a relationship request" section currently says: * Ignore Relationship Request. Reciever does not want mutual relationship, so they ignore the request leaving you with only a one-way relationship.
Will you really be left with a one-way relationship in all cases? Or only if you arrived at this point via a flow that created a one-way relationship first? (I ask because the diagram in the "Relationship States" section shows a flow that goes straight from the "NONTE" state to the "PENDING" state without ever going through a "ONEWAY" state.)
Yes, that is the case. I updated the state diagram to explain what happens when you go when from PENDING when a relationship request is ignored.
Second, the "Relationship States" section currently says:
* TWOWAY: two user's have a relationship with each other, but have not agreed on a how-know message * MUTUAL: two user's have a relationship with each other, and have not agreed on a how-know message I assume there is a typo here. Should MUTUAL instead say "...and have agreement on a..." (i.e. remove the "not")?
Yes. Thanks for catching that. I fixed it.
- Dave