Re: Where to fix the stable branch - Theo Van Dinter - org.apache.spamassassin.dev

20 messages in org.apache.spamassassin.devRe: Where to fix the stable branch

From	Sent On	Attachments
Malte S. Stretz	Jan 4, 2004 6:18 am
Duncan Findlay	Jan 4, 2004 8:09 am
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 4, 2004 9:26 am
Malte S. Stretz	Jan 4, 2004 11:03 am
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 4, 2004 5:07 pm
Justin Mason	Jan 4, 2004 11:57 pm
Malte S. Stretz	Jan 5, 2004 10:16 am
Justin Mason	Jan 5, 2004 10:50 am
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 5, 2004 11:27 am
Justin Mason	Jan 5, 2004 11:57 am
Malte S. Stretz	Jan 5, 2004 1:32 pm
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 5, 2004 6:58 pm
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 5, 2004 8:10 pm
Duncan Findlay	Jan 5, 2004 8:57 pm
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 6, 2004 12:53 pm
Justin Mason	Jan 6, 2004 1:31 pm
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 6, 2004 5:32 pm
Sander Striker	Jan 7, 2004 12:43 am
Malte S. Stretz	Jan 7, 2004 5:20 am
Theo Van Dinter	Jan 7, 2004 7:34 am

Subject:	Re: Where to fix the stable branch
From:	Theo Van Dinter (feli...@kluge.net)
Date:	Jan 4, 2004 9:26:58 am
List:	org.apache.spamassassin.dev

On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 11:10:15AM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:

I've started to really like SVN personally... but we probably should keep the non Apache stuff at sf.net. So I'd say that 2.62 should be done from CVS.

Well, SVN is a copy of the CLA-covered parts of CVS, which was cleaned up pre-move to SVN.

There's 100% no reason to use CVS at this point unless you want to work on the non-CLA stuff in the other modules (asfpurgatory, etc.)

	Start a set with this search
	Include this search in one of my sets
	Exclude this search from one of my sets