vrrp is being used, yes....
-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas M. Todd, Jr. [mailto:dto...@partners.org]
Sent: 12 January 2005 19:10
To: 'Stephen Stuart'
Cc: 'Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN'; Robert Walton;
cisc...@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Layer-2 Flapping log messages
Oops my bad - thx missed the first byte.
This might help http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2338.html
Possible two devices using vrrp?
==DMT>
________________________________
From: Stephen Stuart [mailto:stu...@tech.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 12:54 PM
To: Todd, Douglas M.
Cc: Hudson Delbert J Contr 61 CS/SCBN; Robert Walton;
cisc...@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Layer-2 Flapping log messages
The address in question is a multicast address so it's very
possible
that two machines have the same multicast informtion.
?
Ethernet multicast addresses match the pattern (ether[0] & 1 != 0),
and the Ethernet address in question, 00:00:5E:00:01:1C, has a first
byte of '00' - 00 & 1 = 0, (indicating a unicast Ethernet address).
Stephen
________________________________________________________________________
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
secu...@ffastfill.com
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the FFastFill Email
Security System.
________________________________________________________________________
9 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] Layer-2 Flapping log messages 
