the corrections look, er... correct ;o) the only thing we may want to do is
change "Policy|Rule Combining Alogrithm" (sic) to "Policy|Rule Combiner" to make
things a bit more UMLish.
what portion were you thinking was not 2.0 compliant?
b
Tim Moses wrote:
-----Original Message-----
*From:* Carlisle Adams [mailto:cad...@site.uottawa.ca]
*Sent:* Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:18 AM
*To:* Tim Moses
*Subject:* XACML modification...
Hi Tim,
One of the students around here (Eric) was looking at XACML recently and
thinks he found a discrepancy between one of the diagrams and the
surrounding written description. I haven't really had a chance to
confirm this, but I told him I would forward it to the group (i.e., you)
so that you can look at it. If he's right, it just means modifying the
diagram as indicated in the attachment to this e-mail; the text is all fine.
Just as I think about it now, this seems to me like something that may
have been discussed and eventually changed, so I wonder if it's possible
that Eric was looking at XACML 1.0 rather than a more recent version.
Anyway, thanks for taking a quick look at this whenever you get the chance!
Carlisle.
To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/xacml/members/leave_workgroup.php.
2 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.xacmlRe: [xacml] FW: XACML modification...
.ppt