22 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: bad MX problems...
FromSent OnAttachments
Carlos PazSep 23, 2003 12:39 pm 
Julian MehnleSep 23, 2003 1:45 pm 
Evelyn PichlerSep 23, 2003 2:29 pm 
Eduardo RoldanSep 23, 2003 3:29 pm 
Thomas von HasselSep 24, 2003 12:17 am 
Malcolm WeirSep 24, 2003 12:49 am 
Phillip HutchingsSep 24, 2003 1:27 am 
Malcolm WeirSep 24, 2003 2:29 am 
Julian MehnleSep 24, 2003 3:33 am 
Jon NelsonSep 24, 2003 5:05 am 
Julian MehnleSep 24, 2003 6:16 am 
Alexei Batyr'Sep 24, 2003 6:40 am 
Jon NelsonSep 24, 2003 6:57 am 
Jerry AmundsonSep 24, 2003 7:50 am 
Daniel HigginsSep 24, 2003 8:01 am 
Julian MehnleSep 24, 2003 8:37 am 
dick hoogendijkSep 24, 2003 11:45 am 
Malcolm WeirSep 24, 2003 8:31 pm 
Malcolm WeirSep 24, 2003 9:40 pm 
Julian MehnleSep 25, 2003 6:48 am 
Julian MehnleSep 25, 2003 6:52 am 
Julian MehnleSep 27, 2003 8:44 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[courier-users] Re: bad MX problems...Actions...
From:Alexei Batyr' (leh@pcmag.ru)
Date:Sep 24, 2003 6:40:41 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Jon Nelson wrote on Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:55 PM [GMT+4=MSD]:

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Malcolm Weir wrote:

Which leads to the inevitable observation that there are no prizes for conformance to the RFC, but there are for getting the job done. The job of a mail transfer agent is to transfer mail. Not pass a conformance test based on a specific interpretation of an RFC...

Here here! That's the best summary I've read on this topic yet!

Absolutely!

MTA *should* do its best to deliver mail and *could* provide abilities for strict RFC adepts to make their mail servers totally RFC-conformant.

-- Alexei.