| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Signes | Jul 6, 2011 2:24 pm | |
| Leon Timmermans | Jul 6, 2011 3:19 pm | |
| Zefram | Jul 6, 2011 3:25 pm | |
| Reverend Chip | Jul 6, 2011 3:31 pm | |
| Zefram | Jul 6, 2011 3:49 pm | |
| Reverend Chip | Jul 6, 2011 3:53 pm | |
| Ricardo Signes | Jul 6, 2011 4:14 pm | |
| Zefram | Jul 6, 2011 4:30 pm | |
| Ricardo Signes | Jul 6, 2011 4:36 pm | |
| Reverend Chip | Jul 6, 2011 7:05 pm | |
| Ed Avis | Jul 7, 2011 9:15 am | |
| Jesse Luehrs | Jul 7, 2011 9:19 am | |
| Ed Avis | Jul 7, 2011 9:27 am | |
| Reverend Chip | Jul 7, 2011 9:33 am | |
| Ricardo Signes | Jul 7, 2011 9:43 am | |
| Zefram | Jul 7, 2011 9:43 am | |
| Reverend Chip | Jul 7, 2011 9:50 am | |
| Salvador Fandino | Jul 7, 2011 10:42 am | |
| Ricardo Signes | Jul 7, 2011 11:56 am | |
| Reverend Chip | Jul 7, 2011 12:29 pm | |
| Ricardo Signes | Jul 7, 2011 1:02 pm | |
| Reverend Chip | Jul 7, 2011 1:15 pm | |
| Randal L. Schwartz | Jul 10, 2011 3:42 pm | |
| Yuval Kogman | Jul 16, 2011 8:13 am |
| Subject: | Re: fixing ~~ harder. a lot harder | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Ricardo Signes (perl...@rjbs.manxome.org) | |
| Date: | Jul 6, 2011 4:36:22 pm | |
| List: | org.perl.perl5-porters | |
* Zefram <zef...@fysh.org> [2011-07-06T19:31:01]
Ricardo Signes wrote:
I think that "was enreferenced" marker is not so bad, but I'm not really married to it, if everyone else thinks it is unneeded.
I see a big problem with it. Meta-predicate objects, such as Smart::Match provide, will want to apply arbitrary predicate to arbitrary input. Currently they can do that by "$candidate ~~ $predicate". If enreferencement is significant, they'll need a big branching set of options to *de*reference $candidate just so it can be implicitly re-enreferenced to get the flag right. Of course, you need the *right kind of* dereferencement.
Your point is very well taken, thanks for raising it. Given that I couldn't yet see why we *would* want that flag, I am pretty happy to not worry about it.
-- rjbs





