atom feed69 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRE: putting stupid search engine urls...
FromSent OnAttachments
Igor SysoevAug 28, 2009 6:40 am 
Igor SysoevAug 28, 2009 8:28 am 
Michael ShadleAug 28, 2009 9:10 am 
Igor SysoevAug 28, 2009 9:24 am 
Michael ShadleAug 28, 2009 9:38 am 
Igor SysoevAug 28, 2009 9:54 am 
Igor SysoevAug 28, 2009 9:56 am.Other
SteveAug 28, 2009 1:23 pm 
SteveAug 28, 2009 2:33 pm 
191919Aug 28, 2009 6:32 pm 
AMP AdminAug 28, 2009 9:36 pm 
Ilan BerknerAug 28, 2009 9:42 pm 
Gabriel RamugliaAug 28, 2009 10:14 pm 
Igor SysoevAug 29, 2009 2:49 am 
Jeff WaughAug 29, 2009 5:35 am 
AMP AdminAug 29, 2009 8:26 am 
Gabriel RamugliaAug 29, 2009 2:09 pm 
AMP AdminAug 29, 2009 4:51 pm 
Gabriel RamugliaAug 29, 2009 6:10 pm 
AMP AdminAug 29, 2009 7:12 pm 
AMP AdminAug 29, 2009 7:58 pm 
Gabriel RamugliaAug 29, 2009 9:10 pm 
Marcus ClyneAug 29, 2009 10:57 pm 
Martin SchutAug 30, 2009 5:38 am 
AMP AdminAug 30, 2009 7:21 am 
AMP AdminAug 30, 2009 7:25 am 
Marcus ClyneAug 30, 2009 7:52 am 
AMP AdminAug 30, 2009 8:38 am 
Jim OhlsteinAug 30, 2009 8:57 am 
AMP AdminAug 30, 2009 9:38 am 
Gabriel RamugliaAug 30, 2009 12:37 pm 
AMP AdminAug 30, 2009 1:37 pm 
AMP AdminAug 30, 2009 7:31 pm 
AMP AdminAug 30, 2009 7:43 pm 
Jim OhlsteinAug 30, 2009 8:02 pm 
Gabriel RamugliaAug 30, 2009 9:30 pm 
Igor SysoevAug 30, 2009 10:44 pm 
AMP AdminAug 31, 2009 12:07 pm 
Gabriel RamugliaAug 31, 2009 12:27 pm 
AMP AdminAug 31, 2009 1:58 pm 
AMP AdminAug 31, 2009 2:02 pm 
Igor SysoevAug 31, 2009 2:02 pm 
Michael ShadleAug 31, 2009 2:07 pm 
Cliff WellsAug 31, 2009 2:20 pm 
Igor SysoevAug 31, 2009 9:40 pm 
Cliff WellsSep 1, 2009 9:30 am 
AMP AdminSep 3, 2009 6:27 am 
Igor SysoevSep 3, 2009 6:38 am 
ji...@ohlste.inSep 3, 2009 7:03 am 
AMP AdminSep 3, 2009 7:06 am 
Igor SysoevSep 3, 2009 7:10 am 
AMP AdminSep 5, 2009 6:57 am 
Igor SysoevSep 5, 2009 7:20 am 
AMP AdminSep 5, 2009 9:27 am 
Cliff WellsSep 5, 2009 1:12 pm 
Marcus ClyneSep 5, 2009 1:52 pm 
AMP AdminSep 5, 2009 2:06 pm 
brianmercerSep 5, 2009 9:00 pm 
Igor SysoevSep 5, 2009 9:28 pm 
Gena MakhomedSep 6, 2009 4:09 am 
Igor SysoevSep 6, 2009 4:48 am 
AMP AdminSep 6, 2009 7:58 am 
Cliff WellsSep 6, 2009 11:05 am 
Marcus ClyneSep 6, 2009 12:23 pm 
Cliff WellsSep 6, 2009 4:41 pm 
Marcus ClyneSep 7, 2009 3:44 am 
Cliff WellsSep 7, 2009 11:06 am 
AMP AdminNov 6, 2009 11:04 am 
AMP AdminNov 6, 2009 11:50 am 
Subject:RE: putting stupid search engine urls back
From:AMP Admin (adm@ampprod.com)
Date:Aug 29, 2009 4:51:39 pm
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Hi again Gabriel,

Thank you for your reply.

I think SEF URL's are debatable. The more research I do the more I find them unnecessary. It also makes it difficult for growth. What if you change your cms, forum or whatever and the dynamic content is generated differently? All of your "static lookalike" links are no longer valid. I also believe this to be true with major revisions of current cms, forums and other. If they do a complete code rewrite as many of them claim with major revisions then that might also affect urls too. Eventually you have more lines of rewrites and garbage in your config than anything else which is not the intended use. It may not strain the server but every little bit of helps and if someone thinks they can just let that go then where does it stop?

Anyway, here's an old article that's worth a read in regards to the great sef debate. http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm

Finally, that brings me back to my original question... Finally, that brings me to my original question... How can I turn: /anyone-doing-late-ridei-t19640.html

into: /showthread.php?t=19640

-----Original Message----- From: owne@sysoev.ru [mailto:owne@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Gabriel Ramuglia Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 4:10 PM To: ngi@sysoev.ru Subject: Re: putting stupid search engine urls back

You really shouldn't have to use redirects, I would think. A rewrite (mod rewrite in apache, I think nginx supports similar), will allow people to directly access the friendly urls while your application internally receives a request for the ?something=something urls. If rewrites are using up so much cpu that you'd rather not have search engine traffic than have to take the cpu hit to rewrite urls.... something is seriously wrong.

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 8:27 AM, AMP Admin<adm@ampprod.com> wrote:

It's just that it seems to put a strain on the server to redirect everything.  Maybe I'm doing it wrong.  Also, when people submit content to bookmarks sometimes they get a redirect error.  It says something like 'this page redirects to' and then it won't bookmark.

If I can make a nice clean sef that doesn't cause problems like that then I would love to use it.

Also, if we move to a new platform a year or two down the line then those links woud need another redirect if the new system uses a different url. Does that make sense?

-----Original Message----- From: owne@sysoev.ru [mailto:owne@sysoev.ru] On Behalf Of Gabriel Ramuglia Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 12:15 AM To: ngi@sysoev.ru Subject: Re: putting stupid search engine urls back

If you do that, you're wasting SEO potential. If nothing else, the search engines take into account textual content in your urls when considering the topicality of the page. Without those keywords in the url, you'll have a harder time ranking for the relevant topics of your site.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Ilan Berkner<iber@gmail.com> wrote:

Perhaps not the appropriate forum... but why / where did you hear that it was "stupid" to do / use SEF?

Thanks

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 12:36 AM, AMP Admin <adm@ampprod.com> wrote:

A few years we went along with the buzz about writing search engine friendly urls.  Well now I think that’s stupid and believe the site will get crawled regardless.

Anyway, there’s bots and ppl still looking for the sef urls so I need to change them back.

How can I make:

/anyone-doing-late-ridei-t19640.html

into:

/showthread.php?t=19640