atom feed15 messages in at.iem.pdwebRe: [Pdweb] puredata.info/.org
FromSent OnAttachments
AdrianOct 21, 2006 1:28 pm 
SteffenOct 21, 2006 3:27 pm 
Kyle KlipowiczOct 23, 2006 6:44 am 
Kyle KlipowiczOct 23, 2006 7:53 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigOct 23, 2006 2:42 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerOct 23, 2006 10:00 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerOct 24, 2006 7:45 am 
Kyle KlipowiczOct 24, 2006 9:17 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigOct 24, 2006 9:18 am 
AdrianOct 24, 2006 10:04 am 
Winfried RitschOct 24, 2006 11:23 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerOct 26, 2006 8:34 pm 
Winfried RitschOct 30, 2006 12:13 pm 
SteffenNov 23, 2006 2:12 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerNov 25, 2006 8:46 am 
Subject:Re: [Pdweb] puredata.info/.org
From:Kyle Klipowicz (kyle@gmail.com)
Date:Oct 23, 2006 7:53:39 am
List:at.iem.pdweb

Here is a list of sites that use Plone.

http://plone.org/about/sites/

I was really surprised and pleased by the Creative Commons page: http://creativecommons.org/

~Kyle

On 10/23/06, Adrian <nord@gmail.com> wrote:

;) Good. Who was the guy who overed a graphical skin for plone? Not the implementation, only a layout. There are good tutorials on the plone site, and plone.net is a realy nice site which shows what is possible with plone skinning.

I'm happy that i found at least some people who share the same opinion as i do :D

On 10/23/06, Kyle Klipowicz <kyle@gmail.com> wrote:

Just wanted to shout out: I'm on this list now too, although I know NOTHING about plone!

~Kyle

On 10/21/06, Steffen < stf@dibidut.dk> wrote:

On 21/10/2006, at 22.28, Adrian wrote:

this is a mere echo mail: i want to check how alive this list is.

check.

are there people willing to do a plone-skin? (look at plone.net to see what is possible) because changing from plone to something else is not an option i think. to much work. to much lose.

i think grafical changes are a good start. But i also think that structural changes and silk documentation are important to get the best out of it.

I am, when i get some time, going to make a proposal. But there have, in my opinion already been made good suggestions. fx:

I really do enjoy the layout on the Processing site (http:// processing.org/), since it is very clean and has lots of pictures and a big fat examples section on the front page. If we are trying to market Pd to new users, this is THE most important thing (as previously asserted).

I also enjoy their utilization of subdomains. We could do this with things like http://gem.puredata.org, http:// gridflow.puredata.org , http://pidip.puredata.org , etc.

Also, it would be best if the forum was attached to the main website by at least a prominent link/redirect, if not actually in server space. But we definitely need more pictures: unless you're trying to show off by running lynx, the internet is not a purely textual medium. Besides, the people who actually DO patch Pd without a GUI probably aren't so interested in visiting a more marketing-oriented site anyway. Maybe we could do http:// nogui.puredata.org?

Pete wote:

* What it is, in simple terminology * What people are doing with it * How to install it - where to find different versions, and a sub- page with 'common problems' that people have when installing * Some simple tutorials with patches (the first howto on the current page is Miller's book!)

--

http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com

(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO

--

http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com

(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO