7 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadataRe: [office-metadata] Groups - MetaDa...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| patr...@durusau.net | Jun 21, 2007 5:08 pm | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 21, 2007 5:47 pm | |
| Svante Schubert | Jun 22, 2007 2:46 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 22, 2007 4:27 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Jun 22, 2007 5:48 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 22, 2007 6:10 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Jun 22, 2007 6:29 am |
| Subject: | Re: [office-metadata] Groups - MetaData-Examples_07-06-21 (MetaData-Examples_07-06-21.odt) uploaded | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bruce D'Arcus (bdar...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Jun 21, 2007 5:47:10 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadata | |
Guys,
Looks really good! Nice work.
I have a couple of suggested changes and things to keep in mind for discussions with the TC (based on discussions with Svante today).
First, this:
In this scenario the document editor associates part of the document with metadata.
I really, really think we need to avoid using vague statements like "metadata" when we can instead use more specific terms like "resource description" or "resource property." The reason is because I think people will get confused.
Also, this example has a bunch of problems:
<med:patient rdf:about="http://ex-hospital-DB/patients/ID98765"> <ex:hasID rdf:resource="ID98765"/> <ex:hasVitals> <med:vitalData rdf:about="http://hospital-DB/medical-note-cc1593"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://docs.oasis-open.org/opendocument/meta/ package#Element"/> </rdf:Description> </ex:hasVitals> </med:patient>
First, note that this is not well-formed XML.
Second, resources should be capitalized.
Third, as I mentioned before, I think this nested RDF/XML obscures what's going on with the graph, and should be:
<med:Patient rdf:about="http://ex-hospital-DB/patients/ID98765"> <ex:hasID rdf:resource="ID98765"/> <ex:hasVitals rdf:resource="http://hospital-DB/medical-note-cc1593"/> </med:Patient>
<med:VitalData rdf:about="http://hospital-DB/medical-note-cc1593"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://docs.oasis-open.org/opendocument/meta/ package#Element"/> </med:VitalData>
Finally, surely the rdf:type statement there is wrong, or at least unnecessary?
Bruce