atom feed31 messages in org.apache.incubator.generalRe: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Roland WeberAug 3, 2008 10:58 am 
Roland WeberAug 3, 2008 11:09 am 
Luciano ResendeAug 3, 2008 11:22 am 
Henning SchmiedehausenAug 3, 2008 11:51 am 
Martijn DashorstAug 3, 2008 12:00 pm 
Noel J. BergmanAug 3, 2008 7:24 pm 
Will Glass-HusainAug 3, 2008 7:56 pm 
Angela CymbalakAug 4, 2008 3:46 am 
Carsten ZiegelerAug 4, 2008 6:45 am 
ant elderAug 4, 2008 8:01 am 
Martin CooperAug 4, 2008 8:54 am 
Will Glass-HusainAug 4, 2008 3:59 pm 
Roland WeberAug 5, 2008 8:03 am 
Jukka ZittingAug 5, 2008 8:08 am 
Roland WeberAug 5, 2008 9:10 am 
James CarmanAug 5, 2008 9:15 am 
James CarmanAug 5, 2008 9:18 am 
Craig L RussellAug 5, 2008 1:04 pm 
Martijn DashorstAug 5, 2008 2:55 pm 
Niall PembertonAug 6, 2008 3:56 am 
Noel J. BergmanAug 6, 2008 10:23 am 
Niclas HedhmanAug 6, 2008 7:27 pm 
Niclas HedhmanAug 6, 2008 7:29 pm 
William A. Rowe, Jr.Aug 6, 2008 8:01 pm 
Jukka ZittingAug 7, 2008 1:28 am 
Roland WeberAug 11, 2008 8:42 am 
Roland WeberAug 16, 2008 10:28 am 
Craig L RussellAug 16, 2008 11:02 am 
Will Glass-HusainAug 16, 2008 11:23 am 
Roland WeberAug 19, 2008 10:48 am 
Jukka ZittingAug 20, 2008 1:06 am 
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Accept project PicaGalley into the Incubator
From:Jukka Zitting (jukk@gmail.com)
Date:Aug 7, 2008 1:28:36 am
List:org.apache.incubator.general

Hi,

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Roland Weber <ossf@dubioso.net> wrote:

I also think the names are too similar

I have re-opened the naming discussion on projects@i.a.o. Should we keep this vote running, or should we start a new one after we settle for a different name?

For the record, my vote is -0 due to the naming concern. It seems to me that this vote has enough +1 votes to pass, so IMHO there's no need to restart it unless you do want to change the name.

BR,