15 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] 3550 QoS not working as expected
FromSent OnAttachments
Tim DevriesJan 6, 2005 12:14 pm 
Nick ShahJan 6, 2005 5:39 pm 
Tim DevriesJan 6, 2005 6:21 pm 
Nick ShahJan 6, 2005 6:58 pm 
Tim DevriesJan 6, 2005 7:27 pm 
Nick ShahJan 6, 2005 7:51 pm 
Tim DevriesJan 6, 2005 8:24 pm 
Sam SticklandJan 6, 2005 8:49 pm 
Tim DevriesJan 6, 2005 9:28 pm 
McCallum, RobertJan 7, 2005 3:49 am 
Dmitry ValdovJan 7, 2005 4:03 am 
McCallum, RobertJan 7, 2005 4:05 am 
WILDE, DavidJan 7, 2005 4:25 am 
Nick ShahJan 9, 2005 4:10 am 
Tim DevriesJan 10, 2005 11:02 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] 3550 QoS not working as expectedActions...
From:Tim Devries (tdev@northrock.bm)
Date:Jan 6, 2005 8:24:26 pm
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

I thought it might need to be a layer three interface before it would accept the command as well. That doesn't seem to work though unfortunately.

Thanks,

Tim

-----Original Message----- From: Nick Shah To: Tim Devries; cisc@puck.nether.net Sent: 1/6/05 8:50 PM Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 3550 QoS not working as expected

I seriously doubt that rate limit (as in rate limit command) isnt supported. Rate limiting (as in policing) is supported and the way to do it is by using individual & aggregate policers.

You could though try it to make a spare routed port (no switchport) and then try it.

interface FastEthernet0/6 no switchport ip address x.y.z.a 255.255.255.x rate-limit <blah> end

rgds

-----Original Message----- From: Tim Devries [mailto:tdev@northrock.bm] Sent: Friday, 7 January 2005 11:27 AM To: Nick Shah; Tim Devries; 'cisc@puck.nether.net ' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 3550 QoS not working as expected

There is no non-IP traffic, and I did a sh arp/verified the interface IP's in the ACL. I'm going to try it for the sake of it, though if I've got arp entries that aren't showing that might be a bigger problem ;-0

I guess if that fails I will be trying another version over the weekend, and I'll see if that helps.

I would also like rate-limiting to work, because according to

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps646/ps3816/index.html

"For the first time, customers can deploy network-wide intelligent services, such as advanced quality of service (QoS), **rate-limiting**, Cisco security access control lists, multicast management, and high-performance IP routing-while maintaining the simplicity of traditional LAN switching."

...it should, but I've been unable to find how, and the usual command set doesn't seem to work. Am I missing something here? My immediate thoughts are that perhaps something other than traditional rate-limiting commands is implied?

Thanks,

Tim

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------ This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

------