

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
28 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] Win32 Service Callbacks| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas Börkel | Aug 21, 2007 6:26 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Aug 22, 2007 12:35 am | |
| Wayne Meissner | Aug 22, 2007 4:38 pm | |
| Thomas Börkel | Aug 22, 2007 10:36 pm | |
| Timothy Wall | Aug 31, 2007 7:23 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Aug 31, 2007 7:47 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Aug 31, 2007 7:55 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 3, 2007 6:29 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 3, 2007 1:11 pm | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 6, 2007 11:21 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 7, 2007 7:08 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 7, 2007 7:43 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 10, 2007 12:18 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 10, 2007 4:36 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 10, 2007 5:43 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 10, 2007 6:49 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 11, 2007 4:47 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 11, 2007 6:15 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 11, 2007 6:47 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 11, 2007 6:52 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 11, 2007 8:52 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 11, 2007 10:26 pm | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 12, 2007 5:45 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 12, 2007 5:56 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 12, 2007 6:19 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 12, 2007 7:09 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Sep 12, 2007 8:17 am | |
| Thomas Börkel | Sep 13, 2007 12:58 am |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: [jna-users] Win32 Service Callbacks | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Thomas Börkel (tho...@boerkel.de) | |
| Date: | Sep 11, 2007 10:26:36 pm | |
| List: | net.java.dev.jna.users | |
HI!
Timothy Wall wrote:
That looks correct. Remember that the services control panel doesn't update automatically; you have to force a refresh.
Yes, I know. But still the description stays empty.
I now changed it like this: public boolean ChangeServiceConfig2(Pointer hService, int dwInfoLevel, WINSVC.SERVICE_DESCRIPTION lpInfo);
desc = new WINSVC.SERVICE_DESCRIPTION(); desc.lpDescription = "Test";
success = advapi32.ChangeServiceConfig2(service, WINSVC.SERVICE_CONFIG_DESCRIPTION, desc);
And now I get a scrambled (chinese characters or something) description.
Do you define the structure within the library interface definition? If
No.
not, then its strings may not be encoded the same as the library. Usually it's best (at least with windows) to define the structure within the library interface to ensure that the same mapping and encoding options are used.
Ah, I see. But it's strange, that it worked for another Structure with a String in the same source.
A structure defined within a library interface definition will take on the same type mappings as the library. In this case, if you're using W32API.UNICODE_OPTIONS, functions are looked up using the -W suffix, and java String is converted to a wide string.
You can also use WString to force a wide string to be used.
I did that and it worked. But only with the 2nd way I described, where I can pass the structure itself. If I define the function correctly (with Pointer, so I can pass different types of structs) and use structure.getPointer() I get TRUE as result, but it does not change the description.
Thomas







