atom feed18 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: Pentium optimizations
FromSent OnAttachments
AlexDec 16, 1997 6:59 pm 
Tim LiddelowDec 16, 1997 8:05 pm 
John S. DysonDec 16, 1997 8:37 pm 
AlexDec 16, 1997 9:17 pm 
Tim LiddelowDec 16, 1997 9:36 pm 
Scott MichelDec 16, 1997 10:02 pm 
John S. DysonDec 16, 1997 10:23 pm 
Brian HandyDec 16, 1997 10:47 pm 
John S. DysonDec 16, 1997 11:04 pm 
Warner LoshDec 16, 1997 11:49 pm 
John S. DysonDec 17, 1997 12:04 am 
Poul-Henning KampDec 17, 1997 2:55 am 
Warner LoshDec 17, 1997 7:09 am 
Russell L. CarterDec 17, 1997 7:42 am 
Eivind EklundDec 17, 1997 10:13 am 
Tim LiddelowDec 17, 1997 2:26 pm 
Doug RabsonDec 18, 1997 12:35 pm 
John PolstraDec 21, 1997 1:35 pm 
Subject:Re: Pentium optimizations
From:John S. Dyson (dys@freebsd.org)
Date:Dec 16, 1997 10:23:01 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

Alex said:

The response(s) I got to my "I'm a newbie, anyone know about this problem" was basically met with "well no FreeBSD developers have contacted us, and if they did we'd accept/commit/whatever some changes..".

I expected that they would be cooperative (the EGCS group appears to be culturally similar to us (modulo-GPL).) John Polstra is really our most active ELF/Compiler person, and so he would likely be a better "official FreeBSD" interface. He is also less politically likely to insert his foot into his eating orifice. I do have some PPro mods, and they appear to help performance on average. The PPro is a really wierd creature (like the K6.) The darned processor does so much optimization, it appears to be insensitive to code mods. There are areas of reasonable payoffs, and lots of "obvious" optimizations that end up being neutral.