25 messages in org.ibiblio.lists.xom-interest[XOM-interest] Recursion
FromSent OnAttachments
Wolfgang HoschekFeb 9, 2004 6:42 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 10, 2004 9:25 am 
Wolfgang HoschekFeb 10, 2004 3:23 pm 
jco...@reutershealth.comFeb 10, 2004 3:48 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 11, 2004 1:21 pm 
Wolfgang HoschekFeb 11, 2004 1:24 pm 
jco...@reutershealth.comFeb 11, 2004 2:15 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 11, 2004 3:18 pm 
jco...@reutershealth.comFeb 11, 2004 4:20 pm 
Francois BeausoleilFeb 11, 2004 8:08 pm 
Trimmer, ToddFeb 12, 2004 11:57 am 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldFeb 12, 2004 2:53 pm 
Trimmer, ToddFeb 13, 2004 1:26 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldMar 8, 2004 3:17 pm 
jco...@reutershealth.comMar 8, 2004 4:06 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldMar 8, 2004 4:34 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldMar 9, 2004 11:55 am 
Bradley S. HuffmanMar 9, 2004 12:09 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldMar 9, 2004 1:05 pm 
jco...@reutershealth.comMar 9, 2004 2:04 pm 
jco...@reutershealth.comMar 9, 2004 4:32 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldMar 9, 2004 10:43 pm 
John CowanMar 9, 2004 10:58 pm 
Elliotte Rusty HaroldMar 10, 2004 6:12 am 
Dirk BergstromMar 10, 2004 6:25 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[XOM-interest] RecursionActions...
From:jco...@reutershealth.com (jco@reutershealth.com)
Date:Mar 9, 2004 2:04:23 pm
List:org.ibiblio.lists.xom-interest

Bradley S. Huffman scripsit:

This algorithm needs to be adjusted somewhat for the serialization use case. The key difference is that a serializer needs to process an element twice, once for the start-tag before the children are processed and once for the end-tag after the children are processed.

Just insert the end-tag processing into 4.

Step 4 looks like a infinite loop to me. I think it should be "move to the parent, go to step 3".

Quite right. So step 4 should be:

If the current node is not the initial node: move to the parent, do end-element processing if any, go to step 3.

-- Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so, John Cowan is a tax on income. --Lord Macnaghten (1901) jco@reutershealth.com