atom feed77 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] RE: freemail list and...
FromSent OnAttachments
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 11:31 am 
Jeff PotterJan 5, 2004 12:58 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 1:26 pm 
Gerardo GregoryJan 5, 2004 1:34 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 5, 2004 1:56 pm 
Andrew NewtonJan 5, 2004 3:02 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 5, 2004 3:23 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 3:38 pm 
Andrew NewtonJan 5, 2004 5:49 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 5, 2004 5:57 pm 
Andrew NewtonJan 5, 2004 7:06 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 5, 2004 8:19 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 5, 2004 11:58 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:10 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:11 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:12 am 
Gordon MessmerJan 6, 2004 10:20 am 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 6, 2004 10:50 am 
Malcolm WeirJan 6, 2004 2:10 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 3:07 pm 
Phillip HutchingsJan 6, 2004 3:28 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 3:44 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 3:46 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 6, 2004 3:56 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 4:17 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 4:31 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 4:45 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 5:17 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 5:20 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 5:33 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 5:51 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 6:12 pm 
Malcolm WeirJan 6, 2004 6:17 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 6:22 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 6:34 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 6:47 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 7:10 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 7:42 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 6, 2004 7:53 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 7:54 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 7:56 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 8:13 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 8:16 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 8:19 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 6, 2004 8:22 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 8:22 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 6, 2004 8:29 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 6, 2004 11:19 pm 
RolandJan 7, 2004 3:56 am 
Sam VarshavchikJan 7, 2004 4:14 am 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 10:47 am 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 10:59 am 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 7, 2004 11:37 am 
Malcolm WeirJan 7, 2004 12:18 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 1:09 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 1:40 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 7, 2004 3:08 pm 
Malcolm WeirJan 7, 2004 3:14 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 7, 2004 3:32 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 3:46 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJan 7, 2004 3:50 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 3:52 pm 
Bill MichellJan 7, 2004 3:54 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 3:56 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:03 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:06 pm 
Roger B.A. KloreseJan 7, 2004 4:12 pm 
Phillip HutchingsJan 7, 2004 4:16 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 4:27 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:29 pm 
Mitch (WebCob)Jan 7, 2004 4:32 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 4:33 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 7, 2004 4:58 pm 
Malcolm WeirJan 7, 2004 5:07 pm 
Julian MehnleJan 7, 2004 5:27 pm 
Phillip HutchingsJan 7, 2004 6:33 pm 
Gordon MessmerJan 7, 2004 7:00 pm 
Subject:[courier-users] RE: freemail list and questions about yahoo...
From:Julian Mehnle (lis@mehnle.net)
Date:Jan 7, 2004 3:52:45 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Malcolm Weir <ma@gelt.org> wrote:

Julian Mehnle wrote:

while some people think it should be generally adopted *instead* of rivaling schemes like SPF due to Yahoo's 800lb Gorilla factor.

And you know that... How?

Fact is that 'YASAF' does more. So how do you know that people aren't thinking it should be generally adopted due to the fact that it does more?

I didn't say that there are no other reasons for people. But as became evident
in this thread, some people *do* think that YASAF should be generally adopted
over SPF because of Yahoo's 800lb Gorilla factor -- of course among other
reasons. And this bothers me, because most detais of YASAF aren't even
available yet. Unfortunately, market force seems to be more important than
technical soundness or fitness for the purpose (yeah, alright, we don't exactly
agree on the purpose).

That's my point. You're simply pissed at Yahoo's scheme because, apparently, it isn't SPF. Not because of what it is.

This is not true. I have no financial or emotional affiliation with SPF or its
author whatsoever.

[...] Garlinghouse said Yahoo is seeking a patent on the DomainKeys technology, but will license it at no charge to anyone who wants it. Yahoo is also creating software that will add the capability to Qmail and Sendmail, two of the most common e-mail server programs. This software will be distributed free. [...]

"free"? That sure *sounds* like "free bear", not "free speech". But we won't know for sure until we hear more from Yahoo. Let's wait and see...

Get over yourself, Julian! Since Yahoo isn't *preventing* you from implementing whatever the heck you want, it *is* 'free speech': you can implement SPF, ignore Yahoo, do whatever the blue blazes you want.

Sure they aren't preventing anybody from anything, I never said that. What I
meant to say is that it appears they won't release their software as free
software, free as in "free speech".

To set things clear, if it wasn't for the overkill and the danger of
commercialization by Yahoo, I'd very well start thinking of implementing YASAF
(as soon as the specs are available).

Also, there are sound reasons to patent this sort of thing, not least of which is the protection of the technology against claims of infringement [...]

The finding of "prior art" would protect them anyway.