9 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: ecmascript module
FromSent OnAttachments
Chris FarmiloeJan 19, 2009 6:00 am 
Chris FarmiloeJan 19, 2009 6:03 am 
Igor SysoevJan 19, 2009 6:08 am 
Chris FarmiloeJan 19, 2009 6:37 am 
Phillip B OldhamJan 19, 2009 6:41 am 
Johan BergströmJan 19, 2009 7:19 am 
Chris FarmiloeJan 19, 2009 8:44 am 
Peter LeeeeeeeeeeeeFeb 25, 2009 9:11 am 
Peter LeeeeeeeeeeeeFeb 25, 2009 3:38 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: ecmascript moduleActions...
From:Phillip B Oldham (phi@theactivitypeople.co.uk)
Date:Jan 19, 2009 6:41:18 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

Chris Farmiloe wrote:

Hi,

I've started to build an nginx module to process server-side ecmascript (javascript) by embedding the spidermonkey engine.

This is something I've been hoping would be developed for a while now. However, wouldn't it be better to have the spidermonkey engine running as an SGI/FCGI module rather than embedded, to open it up to more services?

--

*Phillip B Oldham* The Activity People phi@theactivitypeople.co.uk <mailto:phi@theactivitypeople.co.uk>

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*Policies*

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient(s) only and may be confidential. If they have come to you in error, please reply to this e-mail and highlight the error. No action should be taken regarding content, nor must you copy or show them to anyone.

This e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet e-mail is not a 100% secure communications medium, and we have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus. We must advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient should ensure they are completely virus free, and that you understand and observe the lack of security when e-mailing us.