Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Petri Helenius | May 27, 2003 5:52 am | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 27, 2003 7:46 am | |
| Petri Helenius | May 27, 2003 11:03 am | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 27, 2003 11:10 am | |
| Petri Helenius | May 27, 2003 2:17 pm | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 27, 2003 3:03 pm | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 27, 2003 4:29 pm | |
| Petri Helenius | May 27, 2003 10:57 pm | |
| Petri Helenius | May 27, 2003 11:30 pm | |
| Petri Helenius | May 28, 2003 12:24 am | |
| Mike Makonnen | May 28, 2003 12:59 am | |
| David Xu | May 28, 2003 1:56 am | |
| Petri Helenius | May 28, 2003 2:25 am | |
| David Xu | May 28, 2003 2:37 am | |
| Petri Helenius | May 28, 2003 6:51 am | |
| Petri Helenius | May 28, 2003 8:01 am | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 28, 2003 6:23 pm | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 28, 2003 6:28 pm | |
| Petri Helenius | May 29, 2003 12:58 am | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 29, 2003 6:28 am | |
| Martin Blapp | May 29, 2003 6:44 am | |
| Daniel Eischen | May 29, 2003 7:57 am | |
| Terry Lambert | May 29, 2003 8:36 am |
| Subject: | malloc(): error: recursive call | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Petri Helenius (pe...@he.iki.fi) | |
| Date: | May 29, 2003 12:58:56 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-threads | |
Note that if you are using my other spinlock patch (from http://people.freebsd.org/~deischen/kse/spinlock.diffs), that also solves the problem but in a slightly different way. That patch forces the library to reference the spinlock functions (the new spinlock implementation needs some initialization), so the table of references doesn't need to be changed (like the patch in the prior email does).
Will either one of the patches make it to 5.1-RELEASE, please?
Pete





