atom feed36 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-securityRe: Security Model/Target for FreeBSD...
FromSent OnAttachments
Colman ReillyJul 5, 1997 3:43 am 
Adam ShostackJul 5, 1997 8:17 am 
Colman ReillyJul 5, 1997 2:33 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardJul 5, 1997 4:47 pm 
Christopher PetrilliJul 6, 1997 11:27 am 
Jonathan M. BreslerJul 6, 1997 2:50 pm 
Brian MitchellJul 6, 1997 3:20 pm 
Jonathan M. BreslerJul 6, 1997 5:13 pm 
Colman ReillyJul 7, 1997 1:45 am 
Duane H. HesserJul 7, 1997 7:48 am 
Robert N WatsonJul 7, 1997 10:08 am 
Brian MitchellJul 7, 1997 10:58 am 
Adam ShostackJul 7, 1997 11:03 am 
Sean Eric FaganJul 7, 1997 11:37 am 
Robert N WatsonJul 7, 1997 11:46 am 
Jonathan M. BreslerJul 7, 1997 11:53 am 
Robert WatsonJul 7, 1997 1:04 pm 
Kenneth StaileyJul 7, 1997 1:05 pm 
Brian MitchellJul 7, 1997 1:38 pm 
pro...@suburbia.netJul 7, 1997 2:29 pm 
Jim ShanklandJul 7, 1997 3:46 pm 
Daniel O'CallaghanJul 7, 1997 4:20 pm 
Mark NewtonJul 7, 1997 4:47 pm 
Adam ShostackJul 7, 1997 5:58 pm 
Adam ShostackJul 7, 1997 6:09 pm 
Poul-Henning KampJul 7, 1997 11:10 pm 
Robert WatsonJul 8, 1997 8:45 am 
Robert WatsonJul 8, 1997 8:58 am 
Colman ReillyJul 8, 1997 12:33 pm 
Ollivier RobertJul 8, 1997 1:20 pm 
George RobbinsJul 8, 1997 1:59 pm 
Mark NewtonJul 8, 1997 5:29 pm 
Robert WatsonJul 9, 1997 9:09 am 
Eivind EklundJul 9, 1997 9:57 am 
David HollandJul 9, 1997 3:09 pm 
Wes PetersJul 9, 1997 10:07 pm 
Subject:Re: Security Model/Target for FreeBSD or 4.4?
From:Brian Mitchell (bri@firehouse.net)
Date:Jul 6, 1997 3:20:52 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-security

On Sun, 6 Jul 1997, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: in a nutshell, the security model is "you must have permission to do something". the superuser (aka root: uid 0) is can do anything. command audit trail (logging) is not provided. the holes have been in the implementation of that model. the source shows the implementation. which has been of greatly varying quality regarding security. ;( jmb

I'm not sure that's entirely corrent - superuser, for instance, can not (with the exception of holes in various subsystems...) lower the securelevel. I'm not sure what you mean by command audit trail, but process accounting is available, and is pretty darned close to logging commands. Stuff like syscall level accounting such as available in sun's bsm stuff is, unfortunately, not available presently.