Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Edwin Groothuis | Oct 22, 2004 12:45 am | |
| Frank Laszlo | Oct 22, 2004 7:36 am | |
| Adam Weinberger | Oct 22, 2004 7:36 am | |
| Robin Schoonover | Oct 22, 2004 9:01 am | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 22, 2004 9:16 am | |
| Benjamin Lutz | Oct 22, 2004 9:23 am | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 22, 2004 9:24 am | |
| Mark Linimon | Oct 22, 2004 9:32 am | |
| Mike Edenfield | Oct 22, 2004 9:33 am | |
| Oliver Lehmann | Oct 22, 2004 9:46 am | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 22, 2004 10:41 am | |
| Lowell Gilbert | Oct 22, 2004 1:07 pm | |
| Lowell Gilbert | Oct 22, 2004 1:08 pm | |
| Paul Chvostek | Oct 22, 2004 1:14 pm | |
| Robin Schoonover | Oct 22, 2004 3:52 pm | |
| Christopher Nehren | Oct 22, 2004 3:54 pm | |
| Paul Chvostek | Oct 22, 2004 5:17 pm | |
| Parv | Oct 22, 2004 6:55 pm | |
| Jim Trigg | Oct 22, 2004 8:26 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Oct 24, 2004 8:24 am | |
| Jose M Rodriguez | Oct 24, 2004 8:47 am | |
| Jie Gao | Oct 26, 2004 12:40 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 12:47 pm | |
| Matt Douhan | Oct 26, 2004 12:54 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 1:01 pm | |
| Jie Gao | Oct 26, 2004 4:19 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Oct 26, 2004 5:59 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Oct 26, 2004 6:01 pm | |
| Benjamin Lutz | Oct 26, 2004 7:13 pm | |
| Robert Huff | Oct 26, 2004 7:49 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 8:12 pm | |
| Mark Linimon | Oct 26, 2004 8:35 pm | |
| Mark Linimon | Oct 26, 2004 8:41 pm | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 26, 2004 9:03 pm | |
| Matthew Seaman | Oct 27, 2004 1:17 am | |
| Frank J. Laszlo | Oct 27, 2004 4:02 am | |
| Tillman Hodgson | Oct 27, 2004 7:07 am | |
| Roman Neuhauser | Nov 9, 2004 5:11 pm | |
| Radek Kozlowski | Nov 9, 2004 5:31 pm | |
| Roman Neuhauser | Nov 10, 2004 4:59 pm |
| Subject: | ports/www is too full | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Robert Huff (robe...@rcn.com) | |
| Date: | Oct 22, 2004 10:41:25 am | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-ports | |
Mark Linimon writes:
There is also the school of thought that we ought to identify what problem we are trying to solve, and if it's merely a 'search/browse' type of problem, then we should fix our search/browse interfaces and leave the directory layout alone.
Unfortunately, this school of thought seems to have only one adherent, which is myself :-)
Coung mr in. It occurs we may be looking at multiple "problems", which may or may mot have compatible solutions. Someone mentioned finding a (popular) port with a known name; I often want to look at all programs which do <foo>, where FOO is far more detailed than the existing categories support. Anyone else?
Robert Huff





