24 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsSKYPE Sound Problems| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Derrick Edwards | Nov 21, 2004 6:27 pm | |
| Alex...@Leidinger.net | Nov 22, 2004 12:29 pm | |
| Derrick Edwards | Nov 24, 2004 3:47 am | |
| Alexander Leidinger | Nov 24, 2004 8:11 am | |
| Edwin L. Culp | Nov 25, 2004 3:32 am | |
| Derrick Edwards | Dec 17, 2004 12:19 am | |
| Alex...@Leidinger.net | Dec 17, 2004 3:12 am | |
| Joshua Tinnin | Dec 17, 2004 9:09 am | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Dec 17, 2004 9:29 am | |
| Joshua Tinnin | Dec 17, 2004 10:04 am | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Dec 17, 2004 10:58 am | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Dec 17, 2004 11:10 am | |
| Derrick Edwards | Dec 17, 2004 11:18 am | |
| Derrick Edwards | Dec 17, 2004 11:46 am | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Dec 17, 2004 12:05 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Dec 17, 2004 12:15 pm | |
| Joshua Tinnin | Dec 17, 2004 12:43 pm | |
| Joshua Tinnin | Dec 17, 2004 12:53 pm | |
| Derrick Edwards | Dec 17, 2004 5:05 pm | |
| Derrick Edwards | Dec 17, 2004 11:38 pm | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Dec 18, 2004 12:26 am |  .Other |
| Derrick Edwards | Dec 18, 2004 5:50 am | |
| Michael Nottebrock | Dec 18, 2004 6:42 am | |
| Mario Theodoridis | Dec 18, 2004 2:14 pm |
| Subject: | SKYPE Sound Problems | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Joshua Tinnin (krin...@spymac.com) | |
| Date: | Dec 17, 2004 12:53:13 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-ports | |
Sorry, sent this from the wrong email account before; re-sending ...
On Friday 17 December 2004 10:59 am, Michael Nottebrock <mich...@gmx.net> wrote:
On Friday, 17. December 2004 19:45, I wrote:
With that modification, run artsdsp esd and test some app that uses esound (like xmms with the esound output plugin enabled). fstat /dev/dsp* should only show artsdsp.
N.B.: artsdsp esd -nobeeps -as 1 is probably better for real-world usage, since this makes the wrapped esd release the device after 1 second of idle time, allowing artsd to to the same (if configured that way). Oh yeah and -nobeeps is probably self-explaining 8-).
Actually, I find that sysctl works fine with virtual channels. Is there any advantage one way or another? Seems to me like virtual channels is a bit more ... elegant, but I'm not sure if it would matter. Thanks for the patch either way, as it might come in handy, and it's always good to learn about more than one way to solve a problem.
- jt