23 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadataRe: [Fwd: Re: [office-metadata] Reuse...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Bruce D'Arcus | Aug 22, 2007 5:18 pm | |
| Svante Schubert | Aug 23, 2007 9:25 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Aug 23, 2007 10:21 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Aug 23, 2007 11:10 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Aug 23, 2007 12:35 pm | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Aug 23, 2007 12:58 pm | |
| Svante Schubert | Aug 24, 2007 2:35 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Aug 24, 2007 3:04 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Aug 24, 2007 5:12 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Aug 24, 2007 5:21 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Aug 24, 2007 6:31 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Aug 24, 2007 8:32 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Aug 25, 2007 9:03 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Aug 27, 2007 5:16 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Aug 27, 2007 5:38 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Aug 27, 2007 9:10 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Aug 27, 2007 11:47 am | |
| John Madden | Aug 27, 2007 2:31 pm | |
| Svante Schubert | Sep 5, 2007 3:02 am | |
| John F. Madden, MD, PhD | Sep 5, 2007 8:02 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Sep 5, 2007 9:28 am | |
| John F. Madden, MD, PhD | Sep 6, 2007 12:32 pm |  .png, .png |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Sep 6, 2007 12:35 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [office-metadata] Reuse of metadata proposal for nonODF applications] | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Patrick Durusau (patr...@durusau.net) | |
| Date: | Aug 24, 2007 3:04:46 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadata | |
Svante,
Svante Schubert wrote: <snip>
Regarding an RDF subclass, of course all specific ODF elements would inherit from the existing odf:Element OWL class we have already defined.
Nevertheless it seems the odf:Field is just semantic sugar, but not really necessary, as the relation to the text:meta-field is made by the [uri]. It seems even better to use <citation:Field> instead of the <odf:Field> to define a citation:prefix and suffix as it is not clear that all text:meta-field would use this prefix/suffix mechanism as it is currently not defined in ODF.
Perhaps Bruce can clarify what he meant but I think he was proposing that odf:Field would have prefix and suffix material not in the sense of a citation prefix or suffix (I think that would be handled internal to the RDF data on the citation) but something more generic.
That is:
(Whatever prefix, in the sense of occurring before the content generated by text:meta-field) Generated content (Whatever sufficx, in the sense of occurring after the content generated by text:meta-field)
Hmmm, think if it as "fixed" material that while recorded in the metadata file is simply inserted around the content generated by text:meta-field.
I am trying to illustrate that the prefix and suffix need not be part of the generated content of the citation. I think that is being too bound to a particular use case.
I suppose we should wait for Bruce to have time to respond but I think that is what he is talking about.
Hope you are having a great day!
Patrick
-- Patrick Durusau patr...@durusau.net Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34 Acting Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps) Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps) Co-Editor, OpenDocument Format (OASIS, ISO/IEC 26300)