atom feed310 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsiaRE: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #204]...
FromSent OnAttachments
225 earlier messages
Rich ThompsonFeb 24, 2003 9:35 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 24, 2003 9:45 am 
Richard JacobFeb 25, 2003 6:35 am 
Richard JacobFeb 25, 2003 8:32 am 
Andre KramerFeb 25, 2003 10:14 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 4:02 am 
Andre KramerFeb 26, 2003 4:15 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 5:26 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 5:35 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 5:38 am 
Andre KramerFeb 26, 2003 5:55 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:09 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:11 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:17 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:30 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:34 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 6:48 am 
Andre KramerFeb 26, 2003 7:08 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 7:29 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 7:30 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 7:34 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 9:37 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 2:34 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 27, 2003 6:33 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 27, 2003 6:40 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:41 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:54 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:57 am 
Andre KramerFeb 28, 2003 9:59 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:02 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:11 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:19 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:05 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:11 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:15 pm 
Richard JacobMar 3, 2003 6:57 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:10 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:12 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:15 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:32 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:37 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:40 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:43 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:45 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:52 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:55 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:58 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 8:05 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 8:09 am 
Andre KramerMar 4, 2003 8:29 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Andre KramerMar 6, 2003 1:15 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:28 am 
Andre KramerMar 6, 2003 3:39 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:43 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:48 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:01 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:12 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:19 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:28 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:38 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:44 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:51 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:55 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 5:23 am 
Kropp, AlanMar 6, 2003 10:33 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 10:54 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 7, 2003 4:32 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 10, 2003 7:25 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 12, 2003 7:46 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 12, 2003 9:52 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 13, 2003 6:17 am 
Subject:RE: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #204] Fields for cache key
From:Andre Kramer (andr@eu.citrix.com)
Date:Mar 4, 2003 8:29:07 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsia

We don't say that consumers will want to do this. That may be what I am missing. But do people not think sessionID (and authenticationMethod) needs special consideration? And we now specify that UserProfile and templates can vary in a session so consumers should consider the caching implications for these also.

regards, Andre

-----Original Message----- From: Rich Thompson [mailto:ric@us.ibm.com] Sent: 04 March 2003 16:02 To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #204] Fields for cache key

My memory says we decided to only require that markupParams be part of the cache key in v1 even though most Consumers will want to include other fields as well. Do we want to revisit what fields are required to be part of such keys?

Rich Thompson

Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS 03/04/2003 10:44 AM

To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org cc: Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #204] Fields for cache key

Document: Spec Section: 6.1.2. Page/Line: 27/33 Requested by: Andre Kramer

The sessionID field should be used when computing a cache key. Also, if the consumer allows the other runtimeContext fields (excluding extensions)

to vary in a session or for users then these should also be included in the cache key computation. Especially of note here is userAuthentication which may cause portlets to render security sensitive content.

Reason: RuntimeContext can vary per portlet session as well as per user session. Same could be said for PortletContext.portletState and UserContext.