5 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.sca-jRe: [sca-j] JAVA-98:Updated proposed ...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Nash | Apr 23, 2009 8:18 am | |
| David Booz | Apr 24, 2009 5:40 am |  .gif, .gif |
| Simon Nash | Apr 24, 2009 6:25 am | |
| Simon Nash | Apr 24, 2009 6:26 am | |
| David Booz | Apr 24, 2009 6:43 am | .gif, .gif |
| Subject: | Re: [sca-j] JAVA-98:Updated proposed resolution | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Simon Nash (oas...@cjnash.com) | |
| Date: | Apr 24, 2009 6:26:54 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.sca-j | |
David Booz wrote:
The problem with reviewing something over and over is that new thoughts/issues come up every time you look at it.
No problem, it happens to me all the time.
1) JCI spec - section 8 <service/> element generation (lines 376-391) - I think some readers are going to ask, "What about annotations on the interface class?" I'm thinking we should find a way to answer that question with some text....maybe something along the lines of: Interfaces are not introspected but are considered during intent and policySet processing as described in the Java CAA specification [ref] and the Policy FW spec [ref].
See new words in rev3 (just posted).
2) JCI spec - section 8.3 - Why repeat the managedTransaction intent definition here?
I don't think it's a repetition. AFAIK, this specific intent annotation is not defined by any SCA spec, so I defined it in the example to make the example complete.
3) JCI spec - section 8.3 - Was it intentional on your part to NOT implement MyService in MyServiceImpl
Because there is an explicit @Service, it doesn't make any difference whether or not there is a Java "implements" for this interface. I didn't have any specific reason for omitting it.
Simon
no comments on JCAA spec.
Dave Booz STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 e-mail:bo...@us.ibm.com
Inactive hide details for Simon Nash ---04/23/2009 11:19:48 AM---Here are the revised versions of the Java CI and Java CAA docuSimon Nash ---04/23/2009 11:19:48 AM---Here are the revised versions of the Java CI and Java CAA documents with changes for JAVA-98, based
From: Simon Nash <oas...@cjnash.com>
To: OASIS Java <sca...@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 04/23/2009 11:19 AM
Subject: [sca-j] JAVA-98:Updated proposed resolution
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are the revised versions of the Java CI and Java CAA documents with changes for JAVA-98, based on the discussion on Monday's call.
I also noticed that the introspection algorithm for @Service in section 8 of Java CI didn't include the case of @Service specifying an implementation class, and I have corrected this.
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32216/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4%20issue98-rev2.doc http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32214/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd07%20issue98-rev2.doc http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32218/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-cd02-rev4%20issue98-rev2.pdf http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-j/download.php/32215/sca-javaci-1.1-spec-wd07%20issue98-rev2.pdf
Simon
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php