atom feed27 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: VM system info
FromSent OnAttachments
John S. DysonDec 6, 1997 5:30 am 
Joao Carlos Mendes LuisDec 7, 1997 10:24 am 
John S. DysonDec 7, 1997 10:29 am 
Eivind EklundDec 7, 1997 4:43 pm 
Wolfram SchneiderDec 7, 1997 5:37 pm 
John S. DysonDec 7, 1997 5:51 pm 
Mike SmithDec 7, 1997 11:05 pm 
Eivind EklundDec 8, 1997 12:36 am 
Johan GranlundDec 8, 1997 11:05 am 
Andrew ReillyDec 8, 1997 1:27 pm 
Mike SmithDec 8, 1997 4:04 pm 
Eivind EklundDec 8, 1997 4:39 pm 
Mike SmithDec 8, 1997 4:58 pm 
Terry LambertDec 8, 1997 6:03 pm 
Eivind EklundDec 9, 1997 6:11 am 
Eivind EklundDec 9, 1997 6:32 am 
Charles HenrichDec 9, 1997 8:43 am 
Poul-Henning KampDec 9, 1997 9:18 am 
Charles HenrichDec 9, 1997 9:39 am 
Eivind EklundDec 9, 1997 10:58 am 
Charles HenrichDec 9, 1997 11:55 am 
J WunschDec 9, 1997 3:09 pm 
Mike SmithDec 9, 1997 3:25 pm 
Terry LambertDec 9, 1997 7:35 pm 
Terry LambertDec 9, 1997 7:54 pm 
Bruce EvansDec 9, 1997 11:27 pm 
John S. DysonDec 10, 1997 9:27 am 
Subject:Re: VM system info
From:Eivind Eklund (perh@yes.no)
Date:Dec 7, 1997 4:43:38 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

"John S. Dyson" <dys@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:

Joao Carlos Mendes Luis said:

#define quoting(John S. Dyson) // Notes on VM tunables: // // I have recently added some interesting VM tunables. Since it would // be nice if people other than me (or those who requested them) could // use the features, I thought it would be nice to pass this info on:

Is there any place or URL where we can get this information always updated ? It's a pretty good form of documentation I've always wanted to know.

Nope. Unfortunately, the source code is the only place for it (by inference.) The VFS sysctls also deserve some documentation.

Maybe it deserves a handbook section ?

Maybe, but it is extremely kernel version dependent, and would require some commitment to maintain. Otherwise, the info could be confusing.

I'm going to be extremely politically incorrect here:

I want this info in the kernel. At the very least, I want documentation as a part of the SYSCTL_*() macro parameters, unused but available as a (mandatory) part of the source - better would be as a part of the kernel that can be compiled away by setting a kernel option (e.g. NO_SYSCTL_DOCS).

I don't care about the amount of hardwired memory it wastes - memory is extremely cheap, people's time aren't.

Eivind.