On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:15:05 -0500
Ron Johnson wrote:
On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 12:29 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
tir, 22.06.2004 kl. 10.33 skrev Ron Johnson:
If maildrop's processes are owned by the user being delivered
to, then it stands to reason that the only way you are going to
be able to open a cntral og file is if it is world-writeable and
that is not an option I'd care to use.
I'll settle for putting individual logs in each user's home
directory.
What about a world-writable directory like, say, /usr/local/data ?
Flies in the face of all that's sensible. Flies in the face of the
whole concept of security. Why should it be necessary? Redesign
maildrop's logging.
You want secure logging?
"I'll settle for putting individual logs in each user's home
directory."
It works for me....
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr. ron....@cox.net
Jefferson, LA USA
Ron,
Individual logs leaves out two things that I, as sysadmin, consider
important:
1 - Easily monitored logs (to check for problems, performance,
whatever...)
2 - The ability to use filters and divert spam, viruses, etc to a
central place, like the sysadmin.
David
18 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] Re: replacing procmai...
