atom feed77 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: Releases
FromSent OnAttachments
Hays, SamApr 9, 2001 6:32 am 
James RafteryApr 9, 2001 6:45 am 
Steve TremblettApr 9, 2001 6:57 am 
RasputinApr 9, 2001 7:47 am 
Matthew EmmertonApr 9, 2001 8:06 am 
Christopher SchulteApr 9, 2001 8:26 am 
RasputinApr 9, 2001 8:28 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 8:45 am 
Christopher SchulteApr 9, 2001 9:23 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 9, 2001 10:25 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:29 am 
Markus HolmbergApr 9, 2001 10:35 am 
Michael R. RudelApr 9, 2001 10:37 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:38 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:49 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 9, 2001 10:52 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 10:56 am 
David A. KoranApr 9, 2001 11:15 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 9, 2001 11:15 am 
Przemyslaw BrojewskiApr 9, 2001 11:15 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 11:31 am 
Dan LangilleApr 9, 2001 11:36 am 
Przemyslaw BrojewskiApr 9, 2001 11:58 am 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 9, 2001 12:10 pm 
Ken BolingbrokeApr 9, 2001 12:13 pm 
Kal TorakApr 9, 2001 12:34 pm 
Matthew EmmertonApr 9, 2001 12:54 pm 
Jeffrey J. MountinApr 9, 2001 12:54 pm 
Scott DodsonApr 9, 2001 1:15 pm 
Jeff LoveApr 9, 2001 1:28 pm 
David KellyApr 9, 2001 1:42 pm 
Peter RadcliffeApr 9, 2001 1:43 pm 
Ben LoyallApr 9, 2001 2:07 pm 
James PenickApr 9, 2001 2:08 pm 
Juha SaarinenApr 9, 2001 2:20 pm 
Mike MeyerApr 9, 2001 3:54 pm 
Bob KApr 9, 2001 4:22 pm 
Conrad SabatierApr 9, 2001 5:49 pm 
Christopher K DavisApr 9, 2001 5:54 pm 
Matthew EmmertonApr 9, 2001 7:03 pm 
Donn MillerApr 9, 2001 7:12 pm 
Jeffrey J. MountinApr 9, 2001 10:53 pm.Other
Nik ClaytonApr 10, 2001 4:06 am 
Nik ClaytonApr 10, 2001 4:12 am 
Nik ClaytonApr 10, 2001 4:19 am 
Mike MeyerApr 10, 2001 5:51 am 
Steve TremblettApr 10, 2001 6:36 am 
GraywaneApr 10, 2001 6:53 am 
Michael NottebrockApr 10, 2001 8:32 am 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 10, 2001 8:34 am 
Jordan HubbardApr 10, 2001 8:41 am 
Gerhard SittigApr 10, 2001 9:51 am 
Dan LangilleApr 10, 2001 12:33 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 10, 2001 1:52 pm 
Joe AbleyApr 10, 2001 2:28 pm 
Mike MeyerApr 10, 2001 2:46 pm 
David O'BrienApr 10, 2001 2:47 pm 
Dan LangilleApr 10, 2001 2:54 pm 
David O'BrienApr 10, 2001 2:54 pm 
Mike MeyerApr 10, 2001 2:55 pm 
David O'BrienApr 10, 2001 2:56 pm 
Juha SaarinenApr 10, 2001 3:28 pm 
Matthew EmmertonApr 10, 2001 5:28 pm 
Dima DorfmanApr 10, 2001 9:30 pm 
Peter JeremyApr 10, 2001 10:30 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesApr 10, 2001 10:48 pm 
Steve O'Hara-SmithApr 10, 2001 11:00 pm 
Oliver FrommeApr 11, 2001 6:45 am 
David O'BrienApr 11, 2001 10:14 am 
jonathan michaelsApr 11, 2001 12:26 pm 
Oliver FrommeApr 11, 2001 12:48 pm 
Pete FrenchApr 11, 2001 12:58 pm 
Michael ButlerApr 11, 2001 1:13 pm 
jonathan michaelsApr 11, 2001 1:20 pm 
Nik ClaytonApr 11, 2001 2:51 pm 
Dan LangilleApr 11, 2001 3:19 pm 
Nik ClaytonApr 12, 2001 12:57 am 
Subject:Re: Releases
From:Nik Clayton (ni@freebsd.org)
Date:Apr 10, 2001 4:06:39 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 05:29:43AM +1200, Dan Langille wrote:

On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Christopher Schulte wrote:

At 03:45 AM 4/10/2001 +1200, Dan Langille wrote:

Give meaningful and widely used names to things which people are familiar with.

-CURRENT fits all those requirements.

In this case, the familiarity is reduced to those familiar with the project. Witness the frequency with which the confusion arises.

It's question five in the FAQ.

http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/preface.html#CURRENT

The first para says "only of interest to developers working on the system and die-hard hobbyists".

The second para says

If you are not familiar with the operating system or are not capable of identifying the difference between a real problem and a temporary problem, you should not use FreeBSD-CURRENT. This branch sometimes evolves quite quickly and can be un-buildable for a number of days at a time. People that use FreeBSD-CURRENT are expected to be able to analyze any problems and only report them if they are deemed to be mistakes rather than ``glitches''. Questions such as ``make world produces some error about groups'' on the -CURRENT mailing list are sometimes treated with contempt.

I don't see any way in which someone could start running -current without seeing that warning, or the equivalent warnings in the Handbook.

Short of making -current refuse to build without a magic cookie in /etc/make.conf, and a webpage that contains that cookie along with this dire warning, I don't see how we can make it more obvious to people that they shouldn't be running -current if they don't know what they're doing.

N

--- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 ---