| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 8, 2002 12:01 am | |
| Doug Barton | Jul 8, 2002 12:34 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 9, 2002 2:57 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 10, 2002 2:57 am | |
| Giorgos Keramidas | Jul 10, 2002 10:23 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 10, 2002 2:08 pm | |
| Matthew Dillon | Jul 10, 2002 2:21 pm | |
| Bruce Evans | Jul 10, 2002 2:25 pm | |
| Giorgos Keramidas | Jul 10, 2002 2:29 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 10, 2002 2:58 pm | |
| Bruce Evans | Jul 10, 2002 3:22 pm | |
| Peter Wemm | Jul 10, 2002 4:18 pm | |
| Peter Wemm | Jul 10, 2002 4:29 pm | |
| W Gerald Hicks | Jul 10, 2002 4:36 pm | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 10, 2002 4:51 pm | |
| David Schultz | Jul 10, 2002 5:34 pm | |
| Giorgos Keramidas | Jul 10, 2002 6:19 pm | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 10, 2002 9:53 pm | .diff |
| Andrew Kolchoogin | Jul 10, 2002 10:49 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 11, 2002 4:09 am | |
| Bruce Evans | Jul 11, 2002 12:19 pm | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 11, 2002 3:04 pm | |
| Bruce Evans | Jul 11, 2002 7:58 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 13, 2002 3:10 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 14, 2002 3:12 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 15, 2002 3:10 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 16, 2002 3:01 am | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 16, 2002 9:08 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 17, 2002 3:54 am | |
| Rob Hughes | Jul 17, 2002 4:49 am | |
| Sheldon Hearn | Jul 17, 2002 4:55 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 22, 2002 4:49 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 23, 2002 4:49 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 24, 2002 5:00 am | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 24, 2002 7:18 am | |
| John Polstra | Jul 24, 2002 8:41 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 25, 2002 4:26 am | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 25, 2002 7:50 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 25, 2002 9:17 am | |
| John Polstra | Jul 25, 2002 9:21 am | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 25, 2002 9:24 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 26, 2002 4:58 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 27, 2002 4:45 am | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 27, 2002 8:24 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 28, 2002 2:12 am | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 28, 2002 9:04 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 28, 2002 9:47 am | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 28, 2002 9:52 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 28, 2002 10:59 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 28, 2002 2:47 pm | |
| Mike Barcroft | Jul 28, 2002 7:22 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 29, 2002 1:27 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 31, 2002 3:53 am | |
| Maxime Henrion | Jul 31, 2002 5:06 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Jul 31, 2002 4:09 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Aug 1, 2002 4:14 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Aug 1, 2002 4:09 pm | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Aug 2, 2002 4:13 am | |
| Dag-Erling Smorgrav | Aug 4, 2002 3:30 pm |
| Subject: | Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | David Schultz (dsch...@uclink.Berkeley.EDU) | |
| Date: | Jul 10, 2002 5:34:02 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-current | |
Thus spake Peter Wemm <pet...@wemm.org>:
Please do not. gcc is just a tool. If it emits a warning on some arches because gcc doesn't understand how our libraries work, then we should disable the gcc checking for those arches on those functions. ie: remove the __printf0like completely for #ifdef sparc64 for err() etc. ... This is much much less disruptive than slashing through userland and "fixing" something that is already perfectly correct and legal.
I agree that there's little sense in changing the code to work around a compiler bug, but it does not follow that the change is inherently a bad idea. I tend to think of adding descriptive error messages as something that should have been done long ago, and just happens to be slightly more useful now. The change buys us the time to figure out what's really wrong with gcc, rather than disabling and ignoring the offending warnings on sparc64.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message






.diff