atom feed14 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.security-servicesRe: [security-services] Comments on T...
FromSent OnAttachments
Eve L. MalerMar 4, 2007 8:56 pm 
Tom ScavoMar 5, 2007 7:25 am 
Eve L. MalerMar 5, 2007 8:55 am 
Tom ScavoMar 10, 2007 9:33 am 
Eve L. MalerMar 11, 2007 8:45 pm 
Tom ScavoMar 12, 2007 6:39 am 
Paul MadsenMar 26, 2007 7:57 am 
Paul MadsenMar 26, 2007 8:21 am 
Tom ScavoMar 26, 2007 9:24 am 
Paul MadsenJul 19, 2007 6:31 am 
Tom ScavoJul 19, 2007 10:07 am 
Paul MadsenJul 19, 2007 10:20 am 
Tom ScavoJul 19, 2007 11:26 am 
Paul MadsenJul 19, 2007 2:08 pm 
Subject:Re: [security-services] Comments on Tech Overview rev 13
From:Tom Scavo (trsc@gmail.com)
Date:Jul 19, 2007 10:07:23 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.security-services

Paul, I think a dotted line should signify a step that is out of scope. In that case, all four of the steps you mentioned would be represented by dotted lines, I believe.

That's my two cents worth, anyway. :-)

Tom

On 7/19/07, Paul Madsen <paul@rogers.com> wrote:

Finally getting to my graphic editing AI

The various sequence diagrams have some or all of the following message steps

- Access Resource - Challenge for credentials - User Login - Supply resource

Was it the agreement that the first & last are to be drawn as solid lines? And the middle 2 as dotted?

Tom Scavo wrote:

On 3/11/07, Eve L. Maler <Eve.@sun.com> wrote:

I personally don't think we need to hew to this rule.

That's fine. It's mostly pedagogical and not worth quibbling about in general. I personally find this to be a useful rule when writing documentation and so forth since it leads to reasonably complete end-to-end flows that novices can understand.

I'm game to change it -- if Paul feels like doing the graphic editing! But I don't feel it's absolutely essential unless something thinks we're making it more confusing this way.

I'm okay with the single "swoopy arrow" :-) but did we agree that steps 1 and 7 should be represented by a solid line? That's my main concern.