| Subject: | Re: Updated procrun binaries | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Mladen Turk (mtu...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | May 29, 2009 7:09:29 am | |
| List: | org.apache.tomcat.dev | |
Refine Search
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Mladen Turk | May 29, 2009 4:16 am | |
| Konstantin Kolinko | May 29, 2009 5:39 am | |
| Mladen Turk | May 29, 2009 6:33 am | |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. | May 29, 2009 6:59 am | |
| Mladen Turk | May 29, 2009 7:09 am | |
| Konstantin Kolinko | Jun 12, 2009 11:14 am | |
| Mladen Turk | Jun 12, 2009 11:51 am | |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. | Jun 12, 2009 12:44 pm | |
| Mladen Turk | Jun 12, 2009 12:54 pm |
| Subject: | Re: Updated procrun binaries | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Mladen Turk (mtu...@apache.org) | |
| Date: | May 29, 2009 7:09:29 am | |
| List: | org.apache.tomcat.dev | |
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Nevertheless, how about creating separate .zips that would contain tomcat(X)w.exe tomcat(X).exe service.bat and tcnative-1.dll eg. apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win32-native.zip apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win64-native.zip apache-tomcat-6.0.21-win64-ia64-native.zip
ia64 != x64, you realize? there isn't such an architecture as win64.
Yes, I know that. However win64 in 99% is win64-x64
so -win32-x86-native, -win32-x64 and -win32-ia64 would make perfect sense.
Fine with me.
Regards
-- ^(TM)

