3 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-bluetoothwhich modules are mandatory?| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Pietro Cerutti | Mar 6, 2007 6:11 pm | |
| Maksim Yevmenkin | Mar 6, 2007 7:33 pm | |
| Pietro Cerutti | Mar 6, 2007 7:40 pm |
| Subject: | which modules are mandatory? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Pietro Cerutti (piet...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Mar 6, 2007 7:40:06 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-bluetooth | |
On 3/6/07, Maksim Yevmenkin <maks...@gmail.com> wrote:
Pietro,
[...]
I would like to keep my kernel at a minimum, and thus I'd like to know which parts of it should be built in order for bluetooth to work.
ng_ubt(4) - driver for usb bluetooth devices (options NETGRAPH_BLUETOOTH_UBT)
ng_bluetooth(4) - generic code (options NETGRAPH_BLUETOOTH)
ng_hci(4) - bluetooth host controller interface (hci) (options NETGRAPH_BLUETOOTH_HCI)
ng_l2cap(4) - bluetooth link layer control and adaptation protocol (l2cap) (options NETGRAPH_BLUETOOTH_L2CAP)
ng_btsocket(4) - bluetooth sockets/rfcomm (options NETGRAPH_BLUETOOTH_SOCKET)
They're all included by the /sys/modules/netgraph/bluetooth's Makefile.
all of this of course depends on netgraph(4) framework (options NETGRAPH)
I have this one, too.
So, do you see any difference in building those parts by including the relevant OPTIONS in the kernel config file, versus simply make'ing and make install'ing in their subdirectories?
At this point, my configuration seems to be ok. Do you see any other problems?
thanks,
Thanx,
max
-- Pietro Cerutti
- ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org