On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 12:33, Thorsten Haude wrote:
Hi,
please send me every mail only once.
* Kate Porter wrote (2004-03-10 18:45):
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 14:45, Thorsten Haude wrote:
* Brook Humphrey wrote (2004-03-09 21:28):
On Tuesday 09 March 2004 11:49 am, W. van der Linden wrote:
I am using spamassin and maildrop.
But sometimes the mail with if (/^X-Spam-Flag: *YES/)
comes in the normal mailbox.
filter on this instead
if (/^X-Spam-Flag: YES/)
Why would it make a difference?
In a most general sense, it won't. You can filter on just about
anything that shows up. However, filtering on the specific flag that is
meant for spam filtering has some amount of cleanliness and "the right
way to do it" send to it. Some day, you may choose to use a differently
configured SpamAssassin, or a different piece of software altogether.
If you stick with the "standard" way of doing things, you make your life
easier in the long run.
I'm right with you, but look again at the two regexes and please tell
me why they should have different results.
My comment does seem bit odd..
I think I either misunderstood or misquoted the message.
There was the question regarding filtering on subject, and then a suggestion
about X-Spam-Flag. I was talking about comparison of the two.
Apologies.
17 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-maildropRe: [maildropl] maildrop and spamassa...
