10 messages in org.apache.ofbiz.userRe: Improper PULL synchronization fro...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Pradeep Kumar | Jan 23, 2009 11:35 am | |
| Vince M. Clark | Jan 23, 2009 11:53 am | |
| Jacques Le Roux | Jan 23, 2009 2:05 pm | |
| David E Jones | Jan 23, 2009 3:11 pm | |
| Jacques Le Roux | Jan 23, 2009 3:47 pm | |
| Vince M. Clark | Jan 23, 2009 3:49 pm | |
| Pradeep Kumar | Jan 24, 2009 3:15 am | |
| Vince M. Clark | Jan 24, 2009 7:04 am | |
| Jacques Le Roux | Jan 31, 2009 2:51 pm | |
| Jacques Le Roux | Feb 1, 2009 1:26 am |
| Subject: | Re: Improper PULL synchronization from MCS | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Pradeep Kumar (prad...@palindromesoftware.com) | |
| Date: | Jan 24, 2009 3:15:38 am | |
| List: | org.apache.ofbiz.user | |
Hi Vince, As per you, you did the initial PULL, then updated the timestamps on the records and they got pulled properly the next time. Can you pls put some help here that how can we update the timestamps on the records we need for PULL? Is it something different than what happened always before the PULL call becuause before that it updates the next runtime and entitties too? Need help.
regards, Pradeep
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:19 AM, Vince M. Clark <vcl...@globalera.com>wrote:
Agreed, they could still use the web POS interface but run local instances. You would still have sync to deal with but OfBiz could focus on a single POS UI rather than maintaining two.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacq...@les7arts.com> To: us...@ofbiz.apache.org Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 4:47:28 PM (GMT-0700) America/Denver Subject: Re: Improper PULL synchronization from MCS
From: "David E Jones" <davi...@hotwaxmedia.com>
On Jan 23, 2009, at 3:06 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Yes, I agree. I think I will definitively put some effort on this side (WebPos I mean). This for this reason and the others being that XUI is no longer supported and we have issues with it. So it's not yet sure but I'm more an more thinking that the POS component will be legacy on day ...
I doubt the current POS will ever be "legacy" or be abandoned, although it depends on how many choose to use it.
Typically organizations want easier deployment, so a web-based application is great for them.
In some cases things are very "mission critical", like getting money from customers in physical retail locations. In those cases redundancy and minimizing single points of failure is important. If the internet goes down or even the network in the store, they want each cash register to be able to run independently. For all but the smallest retailers that's a mandatory requirement.
They could use the same mechanims with WebPos isn'it (a local DB synchronized) ?
Jacques
-David
-- With regards, S K Pradeep kumar