atom feed15 messages in org.georgialibraries.list.open-ils-devRe: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts
FromSent OnAttachments
Mike RylanderFeb 15, 2011 12:08 pm.pdf
Dan WellsFeb 15, 2011 1:35 pm 
Hardy, ElaineFeb 16, 2011 6:28 am 
Mike RylanderFeb 16, 2011 9:36 am 
Mike RylanderFeb 16, 2011 9:55 am 
Hardy, ElaineFeb 16, 2011 10:44 am 
Mike RylanderFeb 16, 2011 12:09 pm 
Dan WellsFeb 16, 2011 1:43 pm 
Mike RylanderFeb 16, 2011 5:27 pm 
Hardy, ElaineFeb 17, 2011 11:14 am 
Hardy, ElaineFeb 17, 2011 11:34 am 
Mike RylanderFeb 17, 2011 1:05 pm 
Dan WellsFeb 17, 2011 3:53 pm 
Mike RylanderFeb 18, 2011 8:53 am 
Hardy, ElaineFeb 21, 2011 11:03 am 
Subject:Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts
From:Hardy, Elaine (eha@georgialibraries.org)
Date:Feb 17, 2011 11:14:20 am
List:org.georgialibraries.list.open-ils-dev

Dan -- I think it would be beneficial to allow a complete set to be available to be targeted for a hold placed for a specific volume. But, I don’t know that I would put that as a priority 1 if I were doing a requirements doc for this.

Mike -- lf there is still time, I will look through the req doc we are developing for a cataloging module and see if there is anything in it that might be useful for this or bound with. We put writing the doc on hiatus in August and am just know dusting it back off again, so I don't recall if we addresses these two yet.

Elaine

J. Elaine Hardy PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager Georgia Public Library Service, A Unit of the University System of Georgia 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235-7128 404.235-7201, fax

-----Original Message----- From: open@list.georgialibraries.org [mailto:open@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dan Wells Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:44 PM To: Evergreen Development Discussion List Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts

Hello Mike,

Also, I think this quote from Elaine deserves a bit more attention:

I'm particularly interested in how this would function in a consortium like PINES where different libraries might process a multipart set differently. For example, one library might process and circulate a 3 part DVD set as one item, where another might put each in a separate container with a separate barcode.

If we want the complete-set copy from Library A to conclusively fulfill a P-level hold from Library B, we will want to allow multiple parts per copy. Or am I missing something?