Dan -- I think it would be beneficial to allow a complete set to be
available to be targeted for a hold placed for a specific volume. But, I don’t
know that I would put that as a priority 1 if I were doing a requirements
doc for this.
Mike -- lf there is still time, I will look through the req doc we are
developing for a cataloging module and see if there is anything in it that
might be useful for this or bound with. We put writing the doc on hiatus in
August and am just know dusting it back off again, so I don't recall if we
addresses these two yet.
J. Elaine Hardy
PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager
Georgia Public Library Service,
A Unit of the University System of Georgia
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304
[mailto:open...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Dan
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 4:44 PM
To: Evergreen Development Discussion List
Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] Monograph Parts
Also, I think this quote from Elaine deserves a bit more attention:
I'm particularly interested in how this would function in a
consortium like PINES where different libraries might process a
multipart set differently. For example, one library might process and
circulate a 3 part DVD set as one item, where another might put each
in a separate container with a separate barcode.
If we want the complete-set copy from Library A to conclusively fulfill a
P-level hold from Library B, we will want to allow multiple parts per copy.
Or am I missing something?